Will someone provide me with the anti-Thompson argument? Seems to me like he's got the most solid Conservative credentials, despite being a "Hollywood Type." I mean, look at the other options: Governor of Liberal Mass? Pro-abortion Mayor of Liberal New York? The Maverick? The Socially Compassionate Everyman? I thought you guys were looking for the next Reagan. Why not Thompson?
When he came in he was detached, provided poor answers, was lacking in some of the party rhetoric and in general seemed out to lunch. Some of his answers to questions were from 1955 and the others responses were 2 or 3 months late. The stage was set for him, but he didn't grab it and run with it.