With that being said, in the spirit of full disclosure, we expect to see the picture by the end of the week Very Happy
Now this is front page news!!!!
Someone should start a count down timer....
Tim Roche
Gooseguy10 wrote:I am not sure about the pledge deal. I am simply under the impression that everything in the past is in play. This goes for other violations other than drinking/drugs as well.
Schools can get away with a lot of things that would not fly in other parts of society. Searching backpacks/pockets, searching lockers, looking through cars.....in this sense schools have a very wide jurisdiction.
Gooseguy10 wrote:Why is the school made out to be the bad guys here? We have parents threatening lawsuits, walk outs, media attention, debates about the legal rights of the school..... What about the kids that were breaking the law? And to top it off, stupid enough to put in on a public forum?
Gooseguy10 wrote:Like many things in our CURRENT blameless society, there is very little accountability for the students involved. This of course is backed up by the parents fighting to find loopholes so there kid doesn't have to sit out two weeks of lacrosse. Where are the stories about them?
Gooseguy10 wrote:This of course is backed up by the parents fighting to find loopholes so there kid doesn't have to sit out two weeks of lacrosse.
Dulax31 wrote:"innocent until proven guilty"
Definitely not the case in the high school education systems.
That always made me upset in high school, ya the kids are guilty most of the time in these cases, but what about the times when they are truely innocent. I feel everyone should be innocent, UNTIL proven guilty.
Section 13.74. POSSESSION OF 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR, WINE, OR INTOXICATING LIQUOR BY MINORS.
It shall be unlawful for any minor, as defined in Section 13.01 of this Code, to have in the minor's possession any intoxicating liquor, wine, or 3.2 percent malt liquor with the intent to consume the same at any place other than the household of the minor's parents or guardian. Possession of such 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine, or intoxicating liquor at a place other than the household of the minor's parent or guardian shall be prima facie evidence of intent to consume the same at a place other than the household of the minor's parent or guardian. The presence of a minor in an automobile, room, or in a group in which intoxicating liquor, wine, or 3.2 percent malt liquor is contained and is being consumed or has been consumed or is intended to be consumed by minors is prima facie evidence that such intoxicating liquor, wine, or 3.2 percent malt beverage is in the possession of such minor or all of such minors present at such time, providing the parent or guardian of such minor is not present.
(Recodified by Ord. No. 90-27, 6-25-90; Ord. No. 92-5, 2-10-92)
Dulax31 wrote:"innocent until proven guilty"
Definitely not the case in the high school education systems.
That always made me upset in high school, ya the kids are guilty most of the time in these cases, but what about the times when they are truely innocent. I feel everyone should be innocent, UNTIL proven guilty.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests