I think we are seeing a SB faithful on the message board right now? (see above quote)
I think lesser known teams come on here for that exact reason. They are lesser known, so it is assumed they are not worthy of the ranking they get, if that ranking is in the top 5-10. God forbid a team gets in the top 5-10 and makes a run at BYU, CSU, UCSB, Mich, SSU. And when they make that run, it is chaulked up to a down year, overrated, or "lucky".
A few points:
1. UMD did make a run and they lost.
2. Only a few people are saying UMD is unworthy of their ranking.
3. I don't think UMD beating SSU was luck. I think 99% of people here agree it had to do with UMD being better than Sonoma this year. Can they do this year in and year out?
4. You have to understand, every year some team claims "we don't get respect, blahblahblah, we are good, etc, etc.," yet they don't have any thing to show for it other than a 2nd round exit. Is it something to build on? Yes.
5. Yes, SB fans come on here. I can count them on one hand, and they point out "facts," not unrealistic observations.
That being said, I don't really follow your argument. UMD is good, but what else are you looking for? If they make it to the 2nd round consistently then you can start talking them up. Correct me if I am wrong, but this was only the first or second time they made it to the second round, right?