Automatic Bids From "Weaker" Conferences

The 2013 tournament returns to Greenville, SC this May.

Automatic Bids From "Weaker" Conferences

Postby bullhighutewoozgriffclam on Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:27 am

Which conferences will most likely send someone unranked. In other words, what will be the hypothetical cut off point for an at-large bid for teams like Utah or Cal-Poly who might not win out in their conference.
Parker Ellison
U of U '02-'03, '05-'06
Westminster Lacrosse
Assistant Coach
User avatar
bullhighutewoozgriffclam
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:19 pm


Postby CATLAX MAN on Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:25 am

Barring any conference upset winners, the cutoff will be about #13 for the last at-large. The LSA, UMLL, & PCLL will probably have an AQ below that ranking.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby bullhighutewoozgriffclam on Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:04 pm

So... 13 you're probably goin' 12 is pretty much a lock?
Parker Ellison
U of U '02-'03, '05-'06
Westminster Lacrosse
Assistant Coach
User avatar
bullhighutewoozgriffclam
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:19 pm

Postby WaterBoy on Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:17 pm

12 is by no means a guarantee, but it would be fairly unlikely that you would get ousted from there.

In order for that to happen, first you have to have three AQ's from outside of the top 13. Then you need for there to be two conference winner upsets under the following conditions- The winning team has to be outside the top 13, and the losing team has to stay higher than 12. So this has to not only happen once, but twice, and is therefore not very likely. I think the big issue is that it owuld be tough for them not to move closer in the rankings- ie not likely that an entirely unranked team will beat a top 12 team. It's certainly possible, but if I were in the 12th spot, I'd feel pretty confident. 13 though has reason to sweat a little.
User avatar
WaterBoy
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:41 pm

Postby bullhighutewoozgriffclam on Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:18 pm

12 it is.
Parker Ellison
U of U '02-'03, '05-'06
Westminster Lacrosse
Assistant Coach
User avatar
bullhighutewoozgriffclam
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:19 pm

Postby bullhighutewoozgriffclam on Sat Mar 25, 2006 5:04 pm

okay now the utes are 14 and they're in if all highest seeds win their respective conference. hows that work?
Parker Ellison
U of U '02-'03, '05-'06
Westminster Lacrosse
Assistant Coach
User avatar
bullhighutewoozgriffclam
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:19 pm

Postby Tim Gray on Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:29 pm

dig_plan wrote:okay now the utes are 14 and they're in if all highest seeds win their respective conference. hows that work?


B/C 16 teams got the the tourney and right now only PCLL and LSA have teams not ranked in top 16. So those conferences would get the 15 and 16 seeds.
Tim Gray
Head Coach
Men's Lacrosse
Northeastern University
gray.t@alumni.neu.edu
Commissioner PCLL
pioneerlacrosse.com
User avatar
Tim Gray
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:40 am
Location: Boston, MA


Return to Championship Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


cron