Wiley at SSU

Wiley at SSU

Postby slider on Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:05 pm

Just curious about Wiley transferring to 'Noma. I'm assuming that since the WCLL leadership is in charge at SSU, that everything is on the up and up. The timing is interesting though. I didn't think you could play fall-ball at one school and play right away somewhere else at the NCAA level. Has the MDIA addressed this situation before? Can anyone clarify?
slider
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:49 pm


Postby CATLAX MAN on Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:09 pm

Not only the WCLL leadership, but I think Doug Carl is also the MDIA Eligibility chair, so they must know what they are doing.

It appears that Corey Garrard, LMU's second leading scorer from last year, is also not on their roster this year. Don't know where he is now, but that's 2 tough losses.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby pistol pete on Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:56 am

Not particularly newsworthy, but worth a note on the west side gossip arena that is the WCLL board.
Wiley will likely hook up for a few more scores here in the north bay (with a 30/70 ratio, who wouldnt?) , and may provide Noma's midfielders with a welcomed wingman, but the Cossacks reign at the top is over. Without the great wall of Gomez making an impact on the field, Sonoma's cage will be littered with chippys that will slide past their D.

If only Santa Clara could walk the walk, they could capitalize on this moment.

Cal, no way. Too many boys who can milk the college admissions exams, but sputter out come game time.

Chico possibly.
pistol pete
Water Boy
Water Boy
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:44 pm

Postby the lax on Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:33 am

Is Tyson Poor still on Chico State's roster?
User avatar
the lax
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Original 13 Colony lax

Postby CATLAX MAN on Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:03 pm

Wasn't on the roster last year. Isn't on it this year either. Somebody once posted on the old board that he is a pro windsurfer.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby TrojanLaxman5 on Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:38 pm

Tyson Poor is a professional windsurfer and has not played for Chico for 1 to 2 years. Whit Poor is also no longer playing for Chico (wasn't on the team this fall) as I believe he is windsurfing now as well.
Brian Rothenberg
University of Southern California Men's Lacrosse
Class of 2005
www.usclacrosse.com
User avatar
TrojanLaxman5
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:12 pm
Location: San Francisco

Cal

Postby strykr11 on Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:52 am

pistol pete wrote:Not particularly newsworthy, but worth a note on the west side gossip arena that is the WCLL board.
Wiley will likely hook up for a few more scores here in the north bay (with a 30/70 ratio, who wouldnt?) , and may provide Noma's midfielders with a welcomed wingman, but the Cossacks reign at the top is over. Without the great wall of Gomez making an impact on the field, Sonoma's cage will be littered with chippys that will slide past their D.

If only Santa Clara could walk the walk, they could capitalize on this moment.

Cal, no way. Too many boys who can milk the college admissions exams, but sputter out come game time.

Chico possibly.


1) Cal is in the same conference as Santa Clara and SLO. Sonoma and Chico are likewise in the same conference.
2) Chico only beat Cal last year in overtime. Cal could not have had more than 18 players available for that game.
3) The Golden Bears this year have a roster double last years. After a few games those young dedicated cubs may gel. 6 more weeksof playing together till the SLO game.
4) Word is that a potential impact player who had not been playing MDIA Lax freshman year- for obvious reasons- transferred to Cal from Santa Cruz at mid year.
User avatar
strykr11
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:28 am

Re: Cal

Postby CATLAX MAN on Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:23 am

strykr11 wrote: 4) Word is that a potential impact player who had not been playing MDIA Lax freshman year- for obvious reasons- transferred to Cal from Santa Cruz at mid year.


Cal could have used him against UCLA last week.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby Bluevelvet on Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:53 am

They had him against UCLA but he did not score. He did score vs. USC.
Catlaxman, you should be familiar with him, Cameron Sampson, (listed as #51 on WCLL website roster) from Berkeley High. He and Julian Coffman (AA-Oregon) helped to demolish SI in 2003.
Tall, fast middie offered scholarship to D1 Rutgers in lax. Very good player but it won't be enough against UCSB.
User avatar
Bluevelvet
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 653
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:26 am

Postby CATLAX MAN on Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:44 am

Demolish?? A 2 goal game is a demolishing?? Well, I must concede that they were the better team on that day. . . .but on that day only.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby Bluevelvet on Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:51 pm

You should also probably concede that it was not a close game until the last few seconds when SI scored twice to make it look respectable.
See you tonight Catlaxman. I wonder who will have more fans tonight at Cal, Cal or UCSB?
User avatar
Bluevelvet
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 653
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:26 am

Postby the lax on Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:59 pm

I'm guessing UCSB will have more fans. Willy Hung gets bigger crowds than Cal lax.
User avatar
the lax
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Original 13 Colony lax

Postby CATLAX MAN on Fri Feb 04, 2005 2:00 pm

I'll be there. I would have to guess that the UCSB will be larger & louder. I can hear the GAUCHOS chant now.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby sohotrightnow on Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:38 pm

the lax,

You obviously have never been to a Friday night Cal game . Up until 2003, Cal lacrosse drew the 5th largest attendance of ANY sport on campus behind Football, Men's and Women's basketball, and Rugby. Granted, now is a different era in Cal lacrosse and I wouldnt be surprised to see more UCSB fans, but I would put good money on the fact that they have higher turnouts at Friday night games than the majority of MDIA teams
sohotrightnow
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:56 am

Postby TrojanLaxman5 on Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:50 pm

When I talked to Steve Dini last weekend, he said that they expect 800 to 1,000 fans for the UCSB vs. Cal game. Not sure where he came up with this figure, but that's not a bad sized crowd
Brian Rothenberg
University of Southern California Men's Lacrosse
Class of 2005
www.usclacrosse.com
User avatar
TrojanLaxman5
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:12 pm
Location: San Francisco

Next

Return to MCLA D1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


cron