USLIA.com Division 'A' Message Board Poll #1
March 23, 2005
1. Colorado State (13 1st place votes) - 325 pts.
2. Univ of California, Santa Barbara - 306 pts.
3. Sonoma State - 296 pts.
4. Brigham Young - 288 pts.
5. Michigan - 278 pts.
6. Arizona - 248 pts.
7. Colorado - 246 pts.
8. Virginia Tech - 223 pts.
9. Boston College - 205 pts.
10. Oakland - 201 pts.
11. Univ of California, San Diego - 183 pts.
12. Lindenwood - 165 pts.
13. Oregon - 161 pts.
14. Florida State - 148 pts.
15. Utah - 142 pts.
16. Chico State - 123 pts.
17. Georgia Tech - 115 pts.
18. Cal Poly SLO - 106 pts.
19. Chapman - 88 pts.
20. Miami - 80 pts.
21. Minnesota-Duluth - 59 pts.
22. New Hampshire - 54 pts.
23t. Simon Fraser - 39 pts.
23t. Washington - 39 pts.
25. Pittsburg - 30 pts.
Also receiving votes: Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).
Voters: (Aaron Lozano, Brent Burns, bste_lax, byualum*, CATLAX MAN, CSUalum32, DG, Hugh Nunn, jessexy, Mike Messina, tamu33, Tim Whithead, umdulax1)
**used laxpower in place of byualum**
1st (EVER) Division 'A' Message Board Poll
22 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
1st (EVER) Division 'A' Message Board Poll
Last edited by CyLaxKeeper00 on Tue Apr 05, 2005 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Half the game is mental; the other half is being mental."
-
CyLaxKeeper00 - Alum of PCU
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:39 am
- Location: Freehold, NJ
Interestingly enough, the fans' poll is almost a mirror image of the official poll. All of the same teams placed in roughly the same place, with some minor exceptions in the 9-15 range, but we all know those places can be toss-ups. Seems like almost everyone is on the same page. . . with at least one exception.
-
CATLAX MAN - Premium
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
I will admit, I went in thinking it would take me 5 minutes to churn that out. You get to pick number #8 or 9 and then it gets hard. A lot harder when you actually sit down and look over everything.
Matt Benson
University of Iowa Alum
#6 - (2000-2004)
University of Iowa Alum
#6 - (2000-2004)
-
bste_lax - Uncle Rico Wanna-Be
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
CATLAX MAN wrote:Interestingly enough, the fans' poll is almost a mirror image of the official poll. All of the same teams placed in roughly the same place, with some minor exceptions in the 9-15 range, but we all know those places can be toss-ups. Seems like almost everyone is on the same page. . . with at least one exception.
Looking for reasons on New Hampshire and Simon Fraser among others. Just want to hear your reason for their placement, I won't argue it, I won't even reply to it, just want to see it officially. Nobody steps up with an answer, i know the polls are unofficial to the league but then why are they used to determine invites at the end of the year?
Last edited by LaxGuru on Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LaxGuru
- Veteran
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:09 pm
Did anyone really think that a fan-based poll would generate less controversy and indignation than the official top 25 poll?
If so, why?
Every voter (or non-voter for that matter) has opinions about who should be ranked where. Some people do more research than others. Some see more games than others. Some actually listen to the plugging of teams on the boards. Whatever.
If so, why?
Every voter (or non-voter for that matter) has opinions about who should be ranked where. Some people do more research than others. Some see more games than others. Some actually listen to the plugging of teams on the boards. Whatever.
Hugh Nunn
hughnunn@yahoo.com
Let the mind be aware that, though the flesh be bugged, the circumstances of existence are pretty glorious.---Kerouac
hughnunn@yahoo.com
Let the mind be aware that, though the flesh be bugged, the circumstances of existence are pretty glorious.---Kerouac
-
Hugh Nunn - All-Conference
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:43 pm
- Location: Tallahassee, FL
Forum Poll
1. Colorado State (13 1st place votes) - 325 pts.
2. Univ of California, Santa Barbara - 306 pts.
3. Sonoma State - 296 pts.
4. Brigham Young - 288 pts.
5. Michigan - 278 pts.
6. Arizona - 248 pts.
7. Colorado - 246 pts.
8. Virginia Tech - 223 pts.
9. Boston College - 205 pts.
10. Oakland - 201 pts.
11. Univ of California, San Diego - 183 pts.
12. Lindenwood - 165 pts.
13. Oregon - 161 pts.
14. Florida State - 148 pts.
15. Utah - 142 pts.
16. Chico State - 123 pts.
17. Georgia Tech - 115 pts.
18. Cal Poly SLO - 106 pts.
19. Chapman - 88 pts.
20. Miami - 80 pts.
21. Minnesota-Duluth - 59 pts.
22. New Hampshire - 54 pts.
23t. Simon Fraser - 39 pts.
23t. Washington - 39 pts.
25. Pittsburg - 30 pts.
Real Poll
1. Colorado State (27 1st place votes) - 747 pts
2. Univ. of California, Santa Barbara (2 1st place votes) - 714 pts
3. Sonoma State (1 1st place vote) - 681 pts
4. Brigham Young University - 661 pts
5. Michigan - 641 pts
6. Arizona - 574 pts
7. Colorado - 564 pts
8. Virginia Tech - 506 pts
9. Oakland University - 490 pts
10. Boston College - 475 pts
11. Oregon - 391 pts
12. Univ. of California, San Diego - 382 pts
13. Florida State - 377 pts
14. Georgia Tech - 345 pts
15. Lindenwood University - 343 pts
16. Utah - 307 pts
17. Chico State - 278 pts
18. Cal Poly SLO - 221 pts
19. Miami University - 188 pts
20. Chapman University - 146 pts
21. New Hampshire - 143 pts
22. Minnesota-Duluth - 117 pts
23. Washington - 109 pts
24. (tie) Pittsburgh - 79 pts
24. (tie) Simon Fraser University - 79 pts
Looking at the polls together makes me feel better in my vote. Lindenwood is the only team that doesn't seem to match pretty close to the real poll. When you have half the voters and they reach a concesus consistent to the real poll, i think the poll is legit.
As for UNH, I just found it hard to put them any higher because of their close wins against an average TAMU and Tx Tech team. I am also willing to say that after seeing that UNH has lost to Cal 7-6 (3/23) that UNH will probably not be in the poll much longer anyway.
1. Colorado State (13 1st place votes) - 325 pts.
2. Univ of California, Santa Barbara - 306 pts.
3. Sonoma State - 296 pts.
4. Brigham Young - 288 pts.
5. Michigan - 278 pts.
6. Arizona - 248 pts.
7. Colorado - 246 pts.
8. Virginia Tech - 223 pts.
9. Boston College - 205 pts.
10. Oakland - 201 pts.
11. Univ of California, San Diego - 183 pts.
12. Lindenwood - 165 pts.
13. Oregon - 161 pts.
14. Florida State - 148 pts.
15. Utah - 142 pts.
16. Chico State - 123 pts.
17. Georgia Tech - 115 pts.
18. Cal Poly SLO - 106 pts.
19. Chapman - 88 pts.
20. Miami - 80 pts.
21. Minnesota-Duluth - 59 pts.
22. New Hampshire - 54 pts.
23t. Simon Fraser - 39 pts.
23t. Washington - 39 pts.
25. Pittsburg - 30 pts.
Real Poll
1. Colorado State (27 1st place votes) - 747 pts
2. Univ. of California, Santa Barbara (2 1st place votes) - 714 pts
3. Sonoma State (1 1st place vote) - 681 pts
4. Brigham Young University - 661 pts
5. Michigan - 641 pts
6. Arizona - 574 pts
7. Colorado - 564 pts
8. Virginia Tech - 506 pts
9. Oakland University - 490 pts
10. Boston College - 475 pts
11. Oregon - 391 pts
12. Univ. of California, San Diego - 382 pts
13. Florida State - 377 pts
14. Georgia Tech - 345 pts
15. Lindenwood University - 343 pts
16. Utah - 307 pts
17. Chico State - 278 pts
18. Cal Poly SLO - 221 pts
19. Miami University - 188 pts
20. Chapman University - 146 pts
21. New Hampshire - 143 pts
22. Minnesota-Duluth - 117 pts
23. Washington - 109 pts
24. (tie) Pittsburgh - 79 pts
24. (tie) Simon Fraser University - 79 pts
Looking at the polls together makes me feel better in my vote. Lindenwood is the only team that doesn't seem to match pretty close to the real poll. When you have half the voters and they reach a concesus consistent to the real poll, i think the poll is legit.
As for UNH, I just found it hard to put them any higher because of their close wins against an average TAMU and Tx Tech team. I am also willing to say that after seeing that UNH has lost to Cal 7-6 (3/23) that UNH will probably not be in the poll much longer anyway.
<b>Ali Sarvarian
Team Viva # 33</b>
Team Viva # 33</b>
-
tamu33 - All-Conference
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:26 am
Are you kidding me! I know this isn't the official poll and I will argue more on this in a minute...but, in the also receiving votes catergory:
Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).
I don't see A&M in this thing, but I see Texas State? I know A&M has not had a great season but when did losing to ranked opponents get you NO votes! Regardless of A&M's current record they are still a program worthy enough to garner more votes than OSU, CAL, Texas STATE! (who they beat)!
Enough!
Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).
I don't see A&M in this thing, but I see Texas State? I know A&M has not had a great season but when did losing to ranked opponents get you NO votes! Regardless of A&M's current record they are still a program worthy enough to garner more votes than OSU, CAL, Texas STATE! (who they beat)!
Enough!
-
LaxC21 - Veteran
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:56 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
LaxC21 wrote:Are you kidding me! I know this isn't the official poll and I will argue more on this in a minute...but, in the also receiving votes catergory:
Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).
I don't see A&M in this thing, but I see Texas State? I know A&M has not had a great season but when did losing to ranked opponents get you NO votes! Regardless of A&M's current record they are still a program worthy enough to garner more votes than OSU, CAL, Texas STATE! (who they beat)!
Enough!
I thought this was for fun...
For all those who think it is so easy...you should try really being a pollster. It is MUCH tougher than you think. The best part is that after you have spent 2 hours deciding whether to put New Hampshire in front of Pitt (and you have not seen either team play) people come out of the woodwork talking about what a crappy job you did.
another $0.02 deposited
DG
BYU 85-87, 89-92
-
DG - Premium
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:39 pm
- Location: Danville, CA
LaxC21 wrote:Are you kidding me! I know this isn't the official poll and I will argue more on this in a minute...but, in the also receiving votes catergory:
Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).
I don't see A&M in this thing, but I see Texas State? I know A&M has not had a great season but when did losing to ranked opponents get you NO votes! Regardless of A&M's current record they are still a program worthy enough to garner more votes than OSU, CAL, Texas STATE! (who they beat)!
Enough!
Laxpower.com POWER RANKINGS as of 2/21 6am contributed to those extra votes because of the voters missed our deadline so I used it as a replacement.
"Half the game is mental; the other half is being mental."
-
CyLaxKeeper00 - Alum of PCU
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:39 am
- Location: Freehold, NJ
do i need to echo that voting in this poll is much harder than it appears on the outside. well.....it is.
i had a hard time voting for UNH cuz, by the time my votes were due, they had only played 2 games and they beat A&M & Texas Tech.
i am a little disappointed in the A&M team this season. but what i am really disenfranchised about is the west coast bias that is happening. A&M, Florida, missouri, et. al, have scheduled far more aggressively than other teams in this league and are being punished for losing games they are supposed to lose. teams like chico and poly arent playing near the schedule and are not losing the points they should for losing games. doesnt seem fair to me.
i had a hard time voting for UNH cuz, by the time my votes were due, they had only played 2 games and they beat A&M & Texas Tech.
i am a little disappointed in the A&M team this season. but what i am really disenfranchised about is the west coast bias that is happening. A&M, Florida, missouri, et. al, have scheduled far more aggressively than other teams in this league and are being punished for losing games they are supposed to lose. teams like chico and poly arent playing near the schedule and are not losing the points they should for losing games. doesnt seem fair to me.
peace.
jessexy
jessexy
-
jessexy - All-America
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:10 pm
- Location: texas
Going by the fist poll of the season Chico has played #s 4,8,11,12,15,20,21 teams. I think that is aggressive scheduling. Especially when they played the 8 11 and 20 21 teams back to back.
- sdsuspect4L
- Recruit
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:34 pm
OK, whoever had March 25 in the "Why are Chico & Cal Poly rated higher than A&M" pool is this year's winner. Please step forward and claim your prize.
-
CATLAX MAN - Premium
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
22 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests