1st (EVER) Division 'A' Message Board Poll

Discuss the latest MCLA or NCAA Polls here.

1st (EVER) Division 'A' Message Board Poll

Postby CyLaxKeeper00 on Wed Mar 23, 2005 6:41 am

USLIA.com Division 'A' Message Board Poll #1
March 23, 2005

1. Colorado State (13 1st place votes) - 325 pts.
2. Univ of California, Santa Barbara - 306 pts.
3. Sonoma State - 296 pts.
4. Brigham Young - 288 pts.
5. Michigan - 278 pts.
6. Arizona - 248 pts.
7. Colorado - 246 pts.
8. Virginia Tech - 223 pts.
9. Boston College - 205 pts.
10. Oakland - 201 pts.
11. Univ of California, San Diego - 183 pts.
12. Lindenwood - 165 pts.
13. Oregon - 161 pts.
14. Florida State - 148 pts.
15. Utah - 142 pts.
16. Chico State - 123 pts.
17. Georgia Tech - 115 pts.
18. Cal Poly SLO - 106 pts.
19. Chapman - 88 pts.
20. Miami - 80 pts.
21. Minnesota-Duluth - 59 pts.
22. New Hampshire - 54 pts.
23t. Simon Fraser - 39 pts.
23t. Washington - 39 pts.
25. Pittsburg - 30 pts.

Also receiving votes: Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).


Voters: (Aaron Lozano, Brent Burns, bste_lax, byualum*, CATLAX MAN, CSUalum32, DG, Hugh Nunn, jessexy, Mike Messina, tamu33, Tim Whithead, umdulax1)

**used laxpower in place of byualum**
Last edited by CyLaxKeeper00 on Tue Apr 05, 2005 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Half the game is mental; the other half is being mental."
User avatar
CyLaxKeeper00
Alum of PCU
Alum of PCU
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Freehold, NJ


Postby LaxGuru on Wed Mar 23, 2005 12:41 pm

Have you guys even looked at records,scores and who teams played? I never thaught I'd say this but I feel more comfortable with the leagues poll!
LaxGuru
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:09 pm

Postby CATLAX MAN on Wed Mar 23, 2005 1:24 pm

Interestingly enough, the fans' poll is almost a mirror image of the official poll. All of the same teams placed in roughly the same place, with some minor exceptions in the 9-15 range, but we all know those places can be toss-ups. Seems like almost everyone is on the same page. . . with at least one exception.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby bste_lax on Wed Mar 23, 2005 1:38 pm

I will admit, I went in thinking it would take me 5 minutes to churn that out. You get to pick number #8 or 9 and then it gets hard. A lot harder when you actually sit down and look over everything.
Matt Benson
University of Iowa Alum
#6 - (2000-2004)
User avatar
bste_lax
Uncle Rico Wanna-Be
Uncle Rico Wanna-Be
 
Posts: 2353
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby LaxGuru on Wed Mar 23, 2005 1:58 pm

CATLAX MAN wrote:Interestingly enough, the fans' poll is almost a mirror image of the official poll. All of the same teams placed in roughly the same place, with some minor exceptions in the 9-15 range, but we all know those places can be toss-ups. Seems like almost everyone is on the same page. . . with at least one exception.


Looking for reasons on New Hampshire and Simon Fraser among others. Just want to hear your reason for their placement, I won't argue it, I won't even reply to it, just want to see it officially. Nobody steps up with an answer, i know the polls are unofficial to the league but then why are they used to determine invites at the end of the year?
Last edited by LaxGuru on Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
LaxGuru
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:09 pm

Postby AlumniLax on Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:09 pm

IS THE POLL CRAZYNESS EVER GOING TO END!! :x
AlumniLax
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby Hugh Nunn on Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:37 pm

Did anyone really think that a fan-based poll would generate less controversy and indignation than the official top 25 poll?

If so, why?

Every voter (or non-voter for that matter) has opinions about who should be ranked where. Some people do more research than others. Some see more games than others. Some actually listen to the plugging of teams on the boards. Whatever.
Hugh Nunn

hughnunn@yahoo.com

Let the mind be aware that, though the flesh be bugged, the circumstances of existence are pretty glorious.---Kerouac
User avatar
Hugh Nunn
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:43 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Postby tamu33 on Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:15 am

Forum Poll
1. Colorado State (13 1st place votes) - 325 pts.
2. Univ of California, Santa Barbara - 306 pts.
3. Sonoma State - 296 pts.
4. Brigham Young - 288 pts.
5. Michigan - 278 pts.
6. Arizona - 248 pts.
7. Colorado - 246 pts.
8. Virginia Tech - 223 pts.
9. Boston College - 205 pts.
10. Oakland - 201 pts.
11. Univ of California, San Diego - 183 pts.
12. Lindenwood - 165 pts.
13. Oregon - 161 pts.
14. Florida State - 148 pts.
15. Utah - 142 pts.
16. Chico State - 123 pts.
17. Georgia Tech - 115 pts.
18. Cal Poly SLO - 106 pts.
19. Chapman - 88 pts.
20. Miami - 80 pts.
21. Minnesota-Duluth - 59 pts.
22. New Hampshire - 54 pts.
23t. Simon Fraser - 39 pts.
23t. Washington - 39 pts.
25. Pittsburg - 30 pts.


Real Poll
1. Colorado State (27 1st place votes) - 747 pts
2. Univ. of California, Santa Barbara (2 1st place votes) - 714 pts
3. Sonoma State (1 1st place vote) - 681 pts
4. Brigham Young University - 661 pts
5. Michigan - 641 pts
6. Arizona - 574 pts
7. Colorado - 564 pts
8. Virginia Tech - 506 pts
9. Oakland University - 490 pts
10. Boston College - 475 pts
11. Oregon - 391 pts
12. Univ. of California, San Diego - 382 pts
13. Florida State - 377 pts
14. Georgia Tech - 345 pts
15. Lindenwood University - 343 pts
16. Utah - 307 pts
17. Chico State - 278 pts
18. Cal Poly SLO - 221 pts
19. Miami University - 188 pts
20. Chapman University - 146 pts
21. New Hampshire - 143 pts
22. Minnesota-Duluth - 117 pts
23. Washington - 109 pts
24. (tie) Pittsburgh - 79 pts
24. (tie) Simon Fraser University - 79 pts


Looking at the polls together makes me feel better in my vote. Lindenwood is the only team that doesn't seem to match pretty close to the real poll. When you have half the voters and they reach a concesus consistent to the real poll, i think the poll is legit.

As for UNH, I just found it hard to put them any higher because of their close wins against an average TAMU and Tx Tech team. I am also willing to say that after seeing that UNH has lost to Cal 7-6 (3/23) that UNH will probably not be in the poll much longer anyway.
<b>Ali Sarvarian
Team Viva # 33</b>
User avatar
tamu33
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:26 am

Postby LaxC21 on Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:18 pm

Are you kidding me! I know this isn't the official poll and I will argue more on this in a minute...but, in the also receiving votes catergory:

Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).


I don't see A&M in this thing, but I see Texas State? I know A&M has not had a great season but when did losing to ranked opponents get you NO votes! Regardless of A&M's current record they are still a program worthy enough to garner more votes than OSU, CAL, Texas STATE! (who they beat)!

Enough!
User avatar
LaxC21
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:56 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Postby DG on Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:45 pm

LaxC21 wrote:Are you kidding me! I know this isn't the official poll and I will argue more on this in a minute...but, in the also receiving votes catergory:

Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).


I don't see A&M in this thing, but I see Texas State? I know A&M has not had a great season but when did losing to ranked opponents get you NO votes! Regardless of A&M's current record they are still a program worthy enough to garner more votes than OSU, CAL, Texas STATE! (who they beat)!

Enough!


I thought this was for fun... :roll:

For all those who think it is so easy...you should try really being a pollster. It is MUCH tougher than you think. The best part is that after you have spent 2 hours deciding whether to put New Hampshire in front of Pitt (and you have not seen either team play) people come out of the woodwork talking about what a crappy job you did.

another $0.02 deposited

DG
BYU 85-87, 89-92
User avatar
DG
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:39 pm
Location: Danville, CA

Postby tamu33 on Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:46 pm

The thing is... I didn't even vote for a LSA team at ALL.... i didn't even think that any of them deserved votes.
<b>Ali Sarvarian
Team Viva # 33</b>
User avatar
tamu33
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:26 am

Postby CyLaxKeeper00 on Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:29 pm

LaxC21 wrote:Are you kidding me! I know this isn't the official poll and I will argue more on this in a minute...but, in the also receiving votes catergory:

Minnesota (19), Eastern Michigan (11), Florida (10), Michigan State (8), Texas Tech (8), Indiana (6), Vanderbilt (5), Georgia (4), Loyola Marymount (3), Texas State (1), Oregon State (1), California (1).


I don't see A&M in this thing, but I see Texas State? I know A&M has not had a great season but when did losing to ranked opponents get you NO votes! Regardless of A&M's current record they are still a program worthy enough to garner more votes than OSU, CAL, Texas STATE! (who they beat)!

Enough!


Laxpower.com POWER RANKINGS as of 2/21 6am contributed to those extra votes because of the voters missed our deadline so I used it as a replacement.
"Half the game is mental; the other half is being mental."
User avatar
CyLaxKeeper00
Alum of PCU
Alum of PCU
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Freehold, NJ

Postby jessexy on Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:06 am

do i need to echo that voting in this poll is much harder than it appears on the outside. well.....it is.

i had a hard time voting for UNH cuz, by the time my votes were due, they had only played 2 games and they beat A&M & Texas Tech.

i am a little disappointed in the A&M team this season. but what i am really disenfranchised about is the west coast bias that is happening. A&M, Florida, missouri, et. al, have scheduled far more aggressively than other teams in this league and are being punished for losing games they are supposed to lose. teams like chico and poly arent playing near the schedule and are not losing the points they should for losing games. doesnt seem fair to me.
peace.

jessexy
User avatar
jessexy
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:10 pm
Location: texas

Postby sdsuspect4L on Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:13 am

Going by the fist poll of the season Chico has played #s 4,8,11,12,15,20,21 teams. I think that is aggressive scheduling. Especially when they played the 8 11 and 20 21 teams back to back.
sdsuspect4L
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:34 pm

Postby CATLAX MAN on Sat Mar 26, 2005 11:12 am

OK, whoever had March 25 in the "Why are Chico & Cal Poly rated higher than A&M" pool is this year's winner. Please step forward and claim your prize.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Next

Return to Polls

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


cron