MCLA-D1 T25 Results: Apr 7-13th

[Zamboni_Driver]

RANK. TEAM (MCLA RECORD) [T25W/T25L/Non Ranked L]

1. Michigan (11 - 0) [7/0/0]
W.....#16 Colorado....................8-0
W.....#7 Colorado State.............10-9 (2OT)

T25 W: #6 Arizona State (11-8), #1 BYU (12-9), #15 Arizona (9-4), #3 Minn-Duluth (12-9), #14 Lindenwood (20-5)
T25 L:

2. Chapman (12 - 0) [7/0/0]
W.....#8 UCSB.........................12-11

T25 W: #1 BYU (16-15), #9 Northeastern (15-9), #19 Florida (17-6), #25 Utah (14-6), #24 Claremont (23-3), #13 Cal Poly (13-6)
T25 L:

3. Minnesota-Duluth (9 - 2) [3/2/0]
W.....Minnesota.........................18-1
W.....Marquette.........................23-2

T25 W: #12 Boston College (10-5), #17 Arizona (10-6), #4 BYU (8-6)
T25 L: #2 Colorado State (7-9), #7 Michigan (9-12)

4. BYU (8 - 3) [8/3/0]
W.....#20 Lindenwood...............13-6

T25 W: #3 UCSB (15-9), #24 Simon Fraser (17-11), #23 Michigan State (18-6), #8 Arizona State (17-15),#17 Arizona (16-1), #12 Colorado (14-5), #4 CSU (14-6)
T25 L: #15 Chapman (15-16), #7 Michigan (12-9), #7 Minn-Duluth (6-8)

5. Simon Fraser (12 - 1) [4/1/0]
W.....Idaho.........................14-7
W.....Washington St............22-0

T25 W:#14 Lindenwood (13-5), #18 Texas A&M (10-7), #9 Sonoma State (10-9), #5 Oregon (16-8)
T25 L: #1 BYU (11-17)

6. Arizona State (10 - 2) [3/2/0]
W.....San Diego.........................17-11

T25 W: #22 Cal Poly (10-9), #25 Utah (22-8), #10 UCSB (9-8)
T25 L: #8 Michigan (8-11), #4 BYU (15-17)

7. Colorado State (9 - 4) [7/3/1]
L.....#1 Michigan.........................9-10 (2OT)

T25 W: #12 Boston College (9-7), #3 Minn-Duluth (9-7), #24 Texas (13-3), #20 Loyola-Marymont (12-11), #5 Oregon (8-4), #13 Cal Poly (8-4), #25 Arizona (11-8)
T25 L: #9 Sonoma State (8-9), #6 BYU (6-14)
NR L: Utah (10-11)

8. UCSB (10 - 5) [4/5/0]
L.....#2 Chapman.........................11-12

T25 W: #9 Arizona (8-3), #22 Cal-Poly (11-5), #9 Northeastern (7-4), #8 Sonoma State (12-5)
T25 L: #1 BYU (9-15), #12 FSU (6-7), #18 Florida (8-10), #9 ASU (8-9)

9. Sonoma State (10 - 2) [4/2/0]
W.....UC Davis.........................13-8
W.....#10 Oregon....................17-5

T25 W: #17 Texas A&M (10-6), #19 Cal Poly (7-12), #2 Colorado State (9-8)
T25 L: #11 Simon Fraser (9-10), #10 UCSB (5-12)

10. Oregon (11 - 4) [1/3/1]
L.....California.........................7-9
L.....#9 Sonoma State.............5-17

T25 W: #10 Colorado (11-9)
T25 L: #2 Colorado State (8-4), #7 Simon Fraser (8-16)

11. Florida State (14 - 3) [5/3/0]
W.....#13 Florida.........................8-7
W.....South Florida......................24-10

T25 W: #21 Utah (14-6), #22 Central Florida (23-14), #6 UCSB (7-6), #23 Northeastern (17-8)
T25 L: #13 Georgia (9-12), #20 Virginia Tech (13-14), #15 Boston College(8-9)

12. Boston College (8 - 3) [2/3/0]
W.....Stonehill.........................16-3
W.....Connecticut.....................9-4

T25 W: #19 Florida (8-7). #11 Florida State (9-8)
T25 L: #13 Georgia (9-11), #3 Minn-Duluth (5-10), #2 CSU (7-9)

13. Florida (10 - 4) [3/3/1]
L.....#11 FSU.........................7-8

T25 W: #13 Georgia (13-9), #10 UCSB (8-10), #23 Central Florida (13-12)
T25 L: #7 Boston College (7-8), #3 Chapman (6-17)
NR L: Loyola Marymount (11-12 OT)

14. Virginia Tech (13 - 1) [2/0/1]
W.....East Carolina.........................23-1
W.....NC State...............................16-5

T25 W: #13 Georgia (16-13), #11 Florida State (14-13)
T25 L:
NR L: Central Florida (10-15)

15. Georgia (10 - 3) [3/3/0]
W.....Georgia Tech....................19-10

T25 W: #7 Boston College (11-9), #21 Utah (11-9), #16 FSU (12-9)
T25 L: #19 Florida(9-13), #11 Lindenwood (7-10), #21 Virginia Tech (13-16)

16. Colorado (3 - 4) [3/3/1]
L.....#1 Michigan.........................0-8

T25 W: #24 Texas (10-6), #13 Cal Poly (10-2), #25 Arizona (13-6)
T25 L: #5 Oregon (9-11), #6 BYU (5-14)
NR L: Utah (7-12)

17. Cal Poly (7 - 7) [3/7/0]
L.....#21 Standord....................5-9
W.....St. Mary's........................19-3

T25 W: #9 Arizona (8-7), #9 Northeastern (13-9), #25 Utah (10-8)
T25 L: #6 Arizona State (9-10), #3 UCSB (5-11), #10 Sonoma State (7-12), #10 Colorado (2-10), #4 Colorado State (4-8), #2 Chapman (6-13)

18. Texas A&M (12 - 3) [0/3/0]
NR.....LSU
NR.....Baylor

T25 W:
T25 L: #14 Sonoma State (6-10), #20 Simon Fraser (7-10), #14 Lindenwood (6-14)

19. Utah (7 - 7) [3/6/1]
L.....#20 Lindenwood...............12-13

T25 W: #23 Michigan State (12-11), #4 CSU (11-10), #10 Colorado (12-7)
T25 L: #13 Georgia (9-11), #16 FSU(6-14), #8 Arizona State, #3 Chapman (6-14), #13 Cal Poly (8-10)
NR L: Claremont (5-15)

20. Lindenwood (9 - 5) [3/3/2]
L.....#4 BYU............................6-13
W.....#19 Utah........................13-12

T25 W: #13 Georgia (10-7), #22 Indiana (16-7), #18 Texas A&M (14-6)
T25 L: #20 Simon Fraser (5-13), #1 Michigan (5-20)
NR L: Georgia Tech (5-9), Michigan State (9-10)

21. Stanford (11 - 2) [2/1/1]
W.....#17 Cal Poly....................9-5

T25 W: #9 Northeastern (11-10)
T25 L: #3 UCSB (3-7)
NR L: Loyola-Marymount (9-10)

22. Loyola Marymount (9 - 5) [1/4/1]
L.....#23 Claremont.........................10-11

T25 W: #17 Florida (12-11 OT)
T25 L: #17 Chapman (7-18), #16 FSU (15-11), #2 Colorado State (11-12)
NR L: San Diego (5-7)

23. Claremont (9 - 2) [2/2/0]
W.....#22 Loyola Marymount..........11-10

T25 W: #25 Utah (15-5)
T25 L: #5 UCSB (7-13), #2 Chapman (3-23)

24. Michigan State (6 - 3) [1/2/1]
W.....Eastern Michigan..................16-9

T25 W: #14 Lindenwood (10-9)
T25 L: #25 Utah (11-12), #1 BYU (18-6)
NR :: Illinois (6-7)

25. Central Florida (8 - 4) [1/2/2]
IDLE

T25 W: #21 Virginia Tech (15-10)
T25 L: #12 Florida State (14-23), #18 Florida (12-13)
NR L: Santa Clara (10-12), California (9-11)

[Zamboni_Driver]

Edit: Simon Fraser was not IDLE this past week. They had two make -up games. The results are updated.

[Tom]

Thanks for keeping everyone updated on how the Top 25 teams are doing. Do you think you should use the current rankings next to each team? This would be in the W and L columns.

[bchow]

Zamboni_Driver you've done a great job to keeping us up-to-date with what is happening around the league.

In regards to Tom's post, I like it the way that Zamboni_Driver has set it up. I think its good to post the former rankings of teams in the W/L to see what pollsters thought about where teams should be ranked then, so that we might be able to determine a pattern of ranking by allowing us to compare the current status of their team ranking with their W/L ratio. Since this season has turned out to be quite exciting at times with upsets and surprizes, I think showing the rankings of how each team is ranked in each poll next to there current ranking might be a better indicator of their development throughout the season. For me, if I were a pollster, consistency would be a huge factor to look into when deciding where to rank a team. For example, is the loss to an unranked team at the beginning of a season while winning all other games more significant than a team that wins all their games and then loses to an unranked team at the end of their season? This especially makes it difficult when both of these teams make it to their respective division finals and lose when deciding which team should get an AQ bid to go to nationals.

[Zamboni_Driver]

Thanks for keeping everyone updated on how the Top 25 teams are doing. Do you think you should use the current rankings next to each team? This would be in the W and L columns.

So the ranks in the previous T25 W/T25 L summaries are locked based on when the game is played. The reason for that is before the year started we had a poll on whether people wanted the rankings locked at the time of the game or fluid as the season goes (more like laxpower). Freezing the rankings has won out by a large margin the last 2 years. Before next year we'll have another vote to see if that changes. But for this year, they are frozen.

[BB]

Would it be possible to do the below in the future?

Then Now
#4 #7

Or something along those lines. Just a thought you could have both. But if it is a lot of work don't worry you already do enough as is.

[Zamboni_Driver]

Would it be possible to do the below in the future?

Then Now
#4 #7

Or something along those lines. Just a thought you could have both. But if it is a lot of work don't worry you already do enough as is.

I think that would become confusing. But for next year I have been considering 1 more column which is number of wins over teams ranked above them.

[bullhighutewoozgriffclam]

Utah beat CSU and CU. I'm pretty sure they're top 25 teams. I think they should get credit.

[Zamboni_Driver]

Utah beat CSU and CU. I'm pretty sure they're top 25 teams. I think they should get credit.

Good catch. Potentially a cut and paste error, cause I know I had that in there last week.

[bullhighutewoozgriffclam]

i was a tad testy. my bizzle.