Who P's in the cup?

Non-lacrosse specific topics.

Who P's in the cup?

Postby Jolly Roger on Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:47 pm

An interesting topic from another board I frequent

Given that a lot of people need to pass a drug screening test to be eligible for employment and thus contribute state and federal taxes, would it make sense for those receiving assistance from the tax dollars removed from said paychecks to be required to pass a similar screen?

Discuss...
ARRRRG!!!!!! Everyone enjoys a good Rogering!
User avatar
Jolly Roger
Pirate Supreme
Pirate Supreme
 
Posts: 606
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Your worst maritime nightmares


Postby WaterBoy on Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:48 pm

I will take a stab at answering, but first I'll ask this question for clarification (and I'm trying to sound sarcastic here)-

What purpose do you believe that welfare, or rather, "assistance," serves? Stated differently, what is the intention of a welfare or transfer-payment program?

Edit: I sincerely meant to write "not sarcastic" when I posted this- it was really supposed to be a question
Last edited by WaterBoy on Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WaterBoy
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:41 pm

Postby Kyle Berggren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:19 pm

1) Yes.
2) Isn't the point so that lazy people don't have to work or take any responsibility for their lives? It's like a governmental Robin Hood project, except I don't have to try to better myself, I can just collect money, drink, eat, & make more babies to get more money.

Isn't that the program we're talking about? or is that just what it became....

My vote, end welfare as we know it. 6 months of help, that's what you get. After that, if you can't support yourself, assistance goes away, or you live in government housing & perform civil service to pay for it. Think of it as washing dishes for your meal whether it be picking up litter, filing, answering phones, whatever. Or we could continue to give folks money to spend on drugs & booze, while they have more kids to make more money.... Without actually parenting their children.

I'm just a little bitter having grown up in a very poor area, with one parent that worked for the Department of Social & Health Services. Nothing like watching one of her clients move in next door (paid cash for the house) with a Mercedes... while still collecting assistance.
PNCLL Treasurer
User avatar
Kyle Berggren
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Postby UofMLaxGoalie11 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:25 pm

Kyle Berggren wrote:1) Yes.
2) Isn't the point so that lazy people don't have to work or take any responsibility for their lives? It's like a governmental Robin Hood project, except I don't have to try to better myself, I can just collect money, drink, eat, & make more babies to get more money.

Isn't that the program we're talking about? or is that just what it became....

My vote, end welfare as we know it. 6 months of help, that's what you get. After that, if you can't support yourself, assistance goes away, or you live in government housing & perform civil service to pay for it. Think of it as washing dishes for your meal whether it be picking up litter, filing, answering phones, whatever. Or we could continue to give folks money to spend on drugs & booze, while they have more kids to make more money.... Without actually parenting their children.

I'm just a little bitter having grown up in a very poor area, with one parent that worked for the Department of Social & Health Services. Nothing like watching one of her clients move in next door (paid cash for the house) with a Mercedes... while still collecting assistance.

Here, here. Its about time we get some of the protestant work ethic that helped found the country back in our system. A little individual responsibility never hurt anyone. And the protestant work ethic does not in any way suggest pushing a religion. Its simply what my poly sci teacher calls doing what you need to do in order to provide for yourself and those depending on you.
Dan Reeves
University of Minnesota
User avatar
UofMLaxGoalie11
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby Adam G on Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:30 pm

UofMLaxGoalie11 wrote:
Kyle Berggren wrote:1) Yes.
2) Isn't the point so that lazy people don't have to work or take any responsibility for their lives? It's like a governmental Robin Hood project, except I don't have to try to better myself, I can just collect money, drink, eat, & make more babies to get more money.

Isn't that the program we're talking about? or is that just what it became....

My vote, end welfare as we know it. 6 months of help, that's what you get. After that, if you can't support yourself, assistance goes away, or you live in government housing & perform civil service to pay for it. Think of it as washing dishes for your meal whether it be picking up litter, filing, answering phones, whatever. Or we could continue to give folks money to spend on drugs & booze, while they have more kids to make more money.... Without actually parenting their children.

I'm just a little bitter having grown up in a very poor area, with one parent that worked for the Department of Social & Health Services. Nothing like watching one of her clients move in next door (paid cash for the house) with a Mercedes... while still collecting assistance.

Here, here. Its about time we get some of the protestant work ethic that helped found the country back in our system. A little individual responsibility never hurt anyone. And the protestant work ethic does not in any way suggest pushing a religion. Its simply what my poly sci teacher calls doing what you need to do in order to provide for yourself and those depending on you.


Is your teacher Garrison Keillor?
EC Lacrosse Alum '06
User avatar
Adam G
Ain't as good as I once was
Ain't as good as I once was
 
Posts: 582
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Living in a shotgun shack


Return to Water Cooler

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


cron