Sonny wrote:President's Day Morning in Kennesaw, GA:
St. Thomas 7, Kennesaw State 3
Game called at halftime, due to poor field conditions.
Was that an official's decision? Or does it have to be agreed upon by both coaches?
Sonny wrote:President's Day Morning in Kennesaw, GA:
St. Thomas 7, Kennesaw State 3
Game called at halftime, due to poor field conditions.
nhoskins wrote:Sonny wrote:President's Day Morning in Kennesaw, GA:
St. Thomas 7, Kennesaw State 3
Game called at halftime, due to poor field conditions.
Was that an official's decision? Or does it have to be agreed upon by both coaches?
Gvlax wrote:Well after a weekend full of D2 games, any predictions of movement in the poll on Wednesday?
scooter wrote:Gvlax wrote:Well after a weekend full of D2 games, any predictions of movement in the poll on Wednesday?
I would have to think Charlotte moves up, given the circumstances of their loss to UST. I would also not be surprised if UST dropped a spot or two. But I really hope that may teams not starting until later in the season don't get penalized in the voting simply for being idle
Cameron pederson wrote:Are there any teams that are outside of the top 25 that you see moving into the rankings? I would have to say that UWEC would have to be one of them.
Gvlax wrote:horn17 wrote:I say no....I dont think that that loss to a D1 team - that was a close match up shouldnt drop them
But what if a team beats a D1 team. That has to help them correct?
Jolly Roger wrote:Gvlax wrote:horn17 wrote:I say no....I dont think that that loss to a D1 team - that was a close match up shouldnt drop them
But what if a team beats a D1 team. That has to help them correct?
No, because the divisional designations are not based on competitive differences, merely, in our case, the NCAA designation of an institution's football team.
I think the only impact in D1/D2 games is the possibilty of a negative one on the D1 team if they are defeated by a team that is perceived to have less assets from which to draw (student population/facilities/institutional support).
Whether this assessment is fair or not is another topic. I know plenty of D1 schools that have a student population that is very regional with low lacrosse IQ and poor support of non-varsity teams in terms of facilities and finances.
I would also not be surprised if UST dropped a spot or two.
Gvlax wrote: So in the future when teams will get more competitive, scheduling a D1 team in your schedule might do more harm then good. Instead of scheduling that D1 team you might as well schedule a D2 team.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests