WCLL week 3, Post scores, comments, discussions here

[freddoi]

does anyone who watched the ssu/scu game have any comments on how the game went? 7-1 at half to a 10-6 final.....did ssu play backups or what?

[scuwlax]

7-2 at half, 10-6 final. Final SSU goal was scored with 27 seconds left and SCU goalie way out of cage, doubling the ball.

3-1 at end of first
7-2 at half
8-4 at end of third
10-6 final

[Timbalaned]

So has USC stepped it up? SB a little down? or just first couple games of the season gittters for SB?

[Highheat]

From what i understand, it's a combination of those two things, plus UCSB coming out flat. UCSB is having some struggles with a younger defense, and USC apparently has some skilled freshman, who have improved the team quite a bit. That being said, i am quite confident that later in the season, this one wouldn't have been as close.

[NoFlow]

From what i understand, it's a combination of those two things, plus UCSB coming out flat. UCSB is having some struggles with a younger defense, and USC apparently has some skilled freshman, who have improved the team quite a bit. That being said, i am quite confident that later in the season, this one wouldn't have been as close.

This may be biased, but I think just the opposite. While SB did come out a little flat, SC was in control for the better part of three quarters. Another fun fact, SB only scored 3 goals in settled 6v6 situations (by my count) with the others coming mostly from transition and a few from EMO. It really came down to the inexperience of a young USC team in the fourth quarter where USC had 12 turnovers compared to SB's 5. I feel that later in the season these kinks would have been worked out and the game would have been much closer, with the winner being decided very late in the game going either way. This was not a fluke.

Yall better watch out for SC.

[laxative]

This may be biased, but I think just the opposite. While SB did come out a little flat, SC was in control for the better part of three quarters. Another fun fact, SB only scored 3 goals in settled 6v6 situations (by my count) with the others coming mostly from transition and a few from EMO. It really came down to the inexperience of a young USC team in the fourth quarter where USC had 12 turnovers compared to SB's 5. I feel that later in the season these kinks would have been worked out and the game would have been much closer, with the winner being decided very late in the game going either way. This was not a fluke.

Yall better watch out for SC.

Easy no flow. Do your talking on the field and not on the forums. Keep up the good play and you'll get your shot at a rematch in the playoffs.

[MandibleS4L]

Is USC the new Chapman?

[sdsulax7]

I was at the USC vs UCSB game… I saw a skilled USC team put in a few on a flat UCSB team… USC came out the first half and did the right things, held the ball, scored four man up goals, etc… but throughout the game UCSB kept their composure and played their game till the end… In all I thought USC looked good… UCSBs gauge will be this week against BYU… It is obvious that the LA division is getting much tougher..