dtrain34 wrote:With regards to BC and Northeastern, Northeastern has continued to impove throughout the year. I was very impressed with their midfield. Both of those games could have easily gone either way. The refs in Texas will be the difference. BC however has a history of not getting it done when they need to. Sad, but true. So you are world beaters because you beat on the powerhouse teams from USC and Claremont? Cookie? Oh I forgot, you played someone close. And by close I mean that the Gauchos controlled the game the entire time and you never actually threatened after the 1st Qtr.
If that isn't an argument for being looked over, I just don't know what is. You are a flavor of the week, at best.
In this one post, I counted 5 times that you claimed to know something about which you clearly have no clue. Let me outline them for you:
1) Were you at the UCSB game? because if you were, you would know that it was a 1 goal game (5-6) early in the fourth quarter. That's not a threat? You talk big, but in reality you have no idea what you're talking about.
2) The BC NU games: yeah, they could have gone either way. But they didn't. They both went BC's way. Funny how a close game works in NU's favor but doesn't work in BC's (UCSB)....oh wait, I forgot that a 1 goal game in the fourth is a blowout.
3) I know for a fact that you werent at the BC NU games, so how can you possibly say that the refs had something to do with the outcome?
4) You saw NU play in the beginning of the season, and have not seen them since. But somehow, you know that their middies have continued to improve. I'm not saying they haven't, but this is yet another instance of you pretending to know something when you have no clue. Oh and by the way, BC beat them in the PCLL championship game, which happens to be the last game that either team has played...and BC still won even though NU's middies have been improving. Hmmm.... must have been the refs...
5) "BC however has a history of not getting it done when they need to. Sad, but true." Um, in all of the 5 years that we have had a club program, and the 2 years that we have gone to nationals? We've already established that reputation? That's what you're basing this on? Really? The last time BC was in nationals, the players that are seniors now were freshmen, and the coaching staff was completely different. But I mean, I guess if they have a "history of not getting it done," none of that really matters.
I'm not saying that BC is a world beater. And for all I know they might lose in the first round. But come on. You act like you know something about them when you know nothing at all. You are a joke.
