Merger Talk

Merger Talk

Postby Karl Lynch on Sat Apr 14, 2007 6:46 pm

If you want to think out loud about it, here goes.

Two division format

North

OU
OSU
Tech
UNT
SMU
TCU
BU
AC

South

LSU
Tulane
Rice
A&M
TSU
SEU
UT
SU
Trinity

Top four teams from each division go to playoffs
Karl F. Lynch
King of Content
MCLA The Lax Mag
User avatar
Karl Lynch
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:38 pm


Three Division Format

Postby Karl Lynch on Sat Apr 14, 2007 6:48 pm

Three Division Format

North

OSU
OU
Tech
SMU
TCU
AC
UNT

Central

BU
UT
TSU
SU
SEU

South

LSU
Tulane
Rice
A&M
Trinity
Karl F. Lynch
King of Content
MCLA The Lax Mag
User avatar
Karl Lynch
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:38 pm

Postby seulax10 on Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:38 pm

In the three division format, how many teams go to the playoffs from each division?

Where is UTSA? UTA?
Jonathan Davis
St. Edward's University #10
http://www.seulax.com
User avatar
seulax10
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:49 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Postby `MM9 on Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:00 pm

what are the chances of all this happening?
***"you miss 100% of the shots you never take."
-Wayne Gretzky***
User avatar
`MM9
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:25 pm
Location: Austin/San Marcos, TX

Postby murphlaxtx on Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:00 pm

Quite honestly, I think that first option would work quite well.
Scott Murphy
Head Coach
Baylor University Men's Lacrosse
baylorlaxcoach@hotmail.com
User avatar
murphlaxtx
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:54 pm
Location: Waco, Texas

Postby `MM9 on Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:09 pm

Why can't some of the struggling Div A teams, with very few players, bump down?

And Div B teams like TCU and SU can move up...keeping the Divisons more competitive??
***"you miss 100% of the shots you never take."
-Wayne Gretzky***
User avatar
`MM9
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:25 pm
Location: Austin/San Marcos, TX

Postby `MM9 on Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:18 pm

murphlaxtx wrote:Quite honestly, I think that first option would work quite well.


too much power in the south?
***"you miss 100% of the shots you never take."
-Wayne Gretzky***
User avatar
`MM9
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:25 pm
Location: Austin/San Marcos, TX

Postby Kyle Berggren on Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:06 pm

The PNCLL has run several different formats over the last five years, & one thing I can tell you is don't base the decisions based on now. If you're worried about power in the South, ask yourself if it was an issue 3 or 4 years ago? Things will change year in & year out, base your changes on what's best for the conference.
PNCLL Treasurer
User avatar
Kyle Berggren
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Postby benji on Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:29 pm

MM#9 wrote:
murphlaxtx wrote:Quite honestly, I think that first option would work quite well.


too much power in the south?


huh?
Alumni '07
Texas Tech Lacrosse #39
User avatar
benji
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:42 am
Location: Dallas

Postby `MM9 on Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:02 pm

In the 2-div scenario...

it seems like a lot of the power is concentrated in the Southern Division.

maybe a little biased
***"you miss 100% of the shots you never take."
-Wayne Gretzky***
User avatar
`MM9
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:25 pm
Location: Austin/San Marcos, TX

Too much

Postby Karl Lynch on Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:15 am

decisions on the breakdown has nothing to do with relative strengths of the teams. It has to do with regions and administrability. Team strength changes.
Karl F. Lynch
King of Content
MCLA The Lax Mag
User avatar
Karl Lynch
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:38 pm

Postby lax4ever on Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:09 am

As much as I hate soccer, they work their divisions correctly. We ought to have two divisions A & B. Top 8 teams in the LSA are all in the 'A' division. Every year the bottom two teams in the LSA based on conference record move to the 'B' division while the top two teams in the 'B' division move to the 'A' division (the is the idea, logistics can change). This ensures we keep a strong conference. Moving everyone into one division will weaken, not strengthen, the LSA.
"The harder you work, the harder it is to surrender."
-- Vince Lombardi
User avatar
lax4ever
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:07 pm
Location: Texas

Postby KnoxVegas on Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:28 am

Whether you look at the B Division as stand-alone competitive entity or a developmental league, relegation provides the ultimate incentive to be competitive. It rewards teams in both divisions that are successful and allows weaker teams a chance to still play and be competitive rather than struggling to compete against stronger teams.
Dagger!
KnoxVegas
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:03 am

Postby porculator on Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:13 pm

I think its a bad idea for these reasons:

Too many teams in the division means either you don't play everyone in the division, making the playoff scenario less fair, or a high minimum of games. Sometimes the smaller teams can't afford the ref fees (or the bogus ref travel fees) for a lot of games.

I'd rather not have the inevitable problems with div-B teams (forfeits, disorganization, etc) trickle into the A division. Thats just a pain in the ass for everyone.
User avatar
porculator
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:09 pm

Postby JW on Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:02 pm

I definately understand the schools of thought on these games.

Cons - Makes teams like Texas Tech play against Austin College. I don't think that this is worth the trip for tech. While Austin College is improving, there is no way that they should be on the field with them. I will also speak about My Alma Mater. UTA, by rumor will attempt to field a team together. Whatever 10 guys show up to play the games will have a hard time competing with Tech, UT, UNT (as we always did).

Con - If UTSA, Nichols State, UTDallas, A&M Corpus Christi show back up, are we then going to bump teams down.

Pro - The three division format seems to be the better of the two formats. Seems to have a competitive balance as well as good regional balance.

In this format would the top 6 teams make the playoffs with the teams with the best records to make the playoffs?

My suggestion is to allow the teams that have the infrastructure to compete, but the teams that continually forfeit games to play in the developmental B-Division till they are prepared to hold an A - Division schedule...

I like the idea of moving teams up and down as the English Premier league does. The top two teams from the B-Division move up and the bottom two teams from the A - Division move down.

It will be difficult because divisions are supposed to be based on whether or not a University has a Division 1-A football program.

Tough decision to make either way you go about it.
John Williams
Ministry Intern
Cross and Crown Mission www.crossandcrownmission.com
Oklahoma City, OK
Alumnus, 02-04,06
University of Texas - Arlington
PM Me if interested in supporting me in ministry
User avatar
JW
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 4:34 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Next

Return to MCLA D1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


cron