Theoretical Discussion on LSA North/South Alignment

Theoretical Discussion on LSA North/South Alignment

Postby murphlaxtx on Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:55 pm

Now before anyone rips me for starting a topic like this, it is for discussion purposes only right now. Yes, I know we just started this season. Yes, I know a lot can happen between now and the conference meetings. However, it has been brought up to me a few times recently. IF the teams stay the same as they are right now heading into the Fall of 2007, do we look into a possible realignment for next year? Again, I know there will be a lot of factors to look at, such as any team moving up from the B division or any new teams being accepted. With 7 in the North and 5 in the South, it has to beg the question......will a realignment be needed and how will it work?
Scott Murphy
Head Coach
Baylor University Men's Lacrosse
baylorlaxcoach@hotmail.com
User avatar
murphlaxtx
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:54 pm
Location: Waco, Texas


Too early

Postby Karl Lynch on Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:30 pm

Too many contingency to consider right now.

IF you want to play the IF game, UT to the South. Conversation completed.
Karl F. Lynch
King of Content
MCLA The Lax Mag
User avatar
Karl Lynch
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:38 pm

Postby benji on Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:44 pm

I think Karl is correct. Moving Texas to the South would be the only feasible option. Given the results of the past few years of LSA competition, this would have huge implications and could potentially have a dramatic effect on the LSA playoff scenario.

Hypothetically, we could split into three divisions, the north, central, and south, should another team rejoin or move to A in the south
North: Tech, SMU, OU, UNT, OSU
Central: Texas, Baylor, Texas State, TAMU
South: LSU, Rice, Tulane, Other Team

TAMU or TxState and other team could be maneuvered accordingly, depending on the location of the 'Other Team'.

Of course, this is all hypothetical. I'm not sure even how the playoff scenario would work. Maybe the top teams is each division and a wild-card, which would play the team with the worst conference record out of the three division leaders?

I dunno.
Alumni '07
Texas Tech Lacrosse #39
User avatar
benji
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:42 am
Location: Dallas

Postby murphlaxtx on Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:53 pm

Thats a very interesting scenario. This topic is all in good fun anyway, just to pass time between games. I just like to see what ideas people have. There is plenty of time for things to change.
Scott Murphy
Head Coach
Baylor University Men's Lacrosse
baylorlaxcoach@hotmail.com
User avatar
murphlaxtx
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:54 pm
Location: Waco, Texas

Postby OklahomaLax45 on Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:41 pm

I like the three conference look...that'd make things interesting. How would play-off work under that at the end of the year, maybe a round robin or just go straight seeds from each division? But probably the most viable for next fall would be UT going south like karl said

any word on Houston for next year?
Alex Perry
Professional Lacrosse Aficionado
2012 CCLA Coach of the Year

"Thousands have played this game, but only a few can be Sooners."
User avatar
OklahomaLax45
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Postby benji on Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:16 pm

OklahomaLax45 wrote:
any word on Houston for next year?


That was the assumption I was making for 'Other team' ... Haven't heard anything yet though.
Alumni '07
Texas Tech Lacrosse #39
User avatar
benji
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:42 am
Location: Dallas

The IF game

Postby Karl Lynch on Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:19 pm

I am hesitant to realign too deeply with the inevitable departure of three of our division D teams to Division III.

The real work will begin when those teams go.
Karl F. Lynch
King of Content
MCLA The Lax Mag
User avatar
Karl Lynch
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:38 pm

Re: The IF game

Postby Beta on Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:24 pm

Karl Lynch wrote:I am hesitant to realign too deeply with the inevitable departure of three of our division D teams to Division III.

The real work will begin when those teams go.


Which teams are going D III?
Barry Badrinath: Oh man, that's the most disgusting thing I've ever drank.
Landfill: I doubt that very much, playboy
User avatar
Beta
Big Fan of Curves
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: A-Town Stay Down, GA

Re: The IF game

Postby OklahomaLax45 on Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:33 pm

Beta wrote:Which teams are going D III?


i think it's Southwestern and St. Eds...but who's the third? Trinity?

That and i know that Southwestern Oklahoma State is organizing, there'd be another Div B Team
Alex Perry
Professional Lacrosse Aficionado
2012 CCLA Coach of the Year

"Thousands have played this game, but only a few can be Sooners."
User avatar
OklahomaLax45
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Postby shrekjr on Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:05 pm

Hendrix (Arkansas), Trinity, Southwestern, and Austin College are all part of the D-III SCAC. According to a recent discussion with the SCAC Assistant Commisioner, he acknowledged that lacrosse would most likely be the next sport to enter varsity play in the conference. However, he also stated there is no time frame to do that and there is nothing currently on the table.

Given that, Hendrix has hired a coach to prepare for varsity play in the spring of 2008. I guess that means they will be joining a different conference for lacrosse until the SCAC has its own conference.
User avatar
shrekjr
Old ugly deaf blind ref
Old ugly deaf blind ref
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Texas

Postby bawigga on Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:00 am

What was that team that attempted to join the LSA I think 2 seasons ago then bailed because of lack of interest (from Louisiana?)? Have we heard from them at all?
Brian Wigginton
TCU Lacrosse V.P.
b.wigginton@tcu.edu
User avatar
bawigga
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:15 pm
Location: Ft. Worth

Postby Campbell on Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:08 am

bawigga wrote:What was that team that attempted to join the LSA I think 2 seasons ago then bailed because of lack of interest (from Louisiana?)? Have we heard from them at all?


Loyola-NO?
User avatar
Campbell
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:57 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Postby Brent Burns on Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:28 am

Campbell wrote:
bawigga wrote:What was that team that attempted to join the LSA I think 2 seasons ago then bailed because of lack of interest (from Louisiana?)? Have we heard from them at all?


Loyola-NO?


Yes. Another team from Louisiana was Nicholls State (LSA Div. B).
Brent

a LSA Fan.
User avatar
Brent Burns
Coca-Cola Collector
Coca-Cola Collector
 
Posts: 2159
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: in the Hewitt

Postby Tarzan on Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:14 am

Loyola NO is still around...They play against NOLC often and bring numbers depending on how the sun is shining.

Nicholls is another story.
All progress requires change. But not all change is progress."
--John Wooden,
legendary basketball coach
User avatar
Tarzan
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:50 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas

Postby bawigga on Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:24 pm

Maybe it was Loyola-NO, I can't remember...
Brian Wigginton
TCU Lacrosse V.P.
b.wigginton@tcu.edu
User avatar
bawigga
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:15 pm
Location: Ft. Worth

Next

Return to MCLA D1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


cron