NLL Announces Field League for 2008

NLL Announces Field League for 2008

Postby Phantanimal on Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:44 pm

The NLL announced a field league for 2008. I'm sure there's more to come on this topic. Do you think the MLL and NLL will merge?


SPORTS BUSINESS JOURNAL
Lacrosse league moving onto other’s turf
By TRIPP MICKLE
Staff writer

Published December 04, 2006
The outdoor battle between the lacrosse leagues is on.

Owners of the 13-team, indoor National Lacrosse League recently voted unanimously to add traditional outdoor lacrosse beginning in 2008.

Major League Lacrosse has been playing outside for six seasons.
The new outdoor league will allow NLL a more comprehensive package to attract potential sponsors, broadcasters and players and pits it against Major League Lacrosse, the 10-team league that will start its seventh outdoor season in May.

“We’re not trying to start a war,” said one longtime NLL owner. “The push for this is coming from the outside more than the inside. There’s four teams really interested, but sponsors are also interested and so is our TV network (Versus). The first question every prospective owner asks is about outdoor.”

Initial reaction from MLL founder Jake Steinfeld was skepticism. “We welcome the competition,” he said. “I absolutely don’t think there is enough of an audience today for two leagues, but frankly I’m flattered.”

Sources said the NLL hopes to field an outdoor league of at least four teams. It would play from August to November, which means the majority of games would not compete with MLL’s May-to-August season.

The NLL had no comment on possible outdoor plans.


Full article here (log in required):
http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=article.main&articleId=53077
Falsehoods are well-told, so think for yourself...
User avatar
Phantanimal
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:33 am


Postby CyLaxKeeper00 on Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:07 pm

XFL or MLL/NLL merger in 5 years?
"Half the game is mental; the other half is being mental."
User avatar
CyLaxKeeper00
Alum of PCU
Alum of PCU
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Freehold, NJ

Postby BigheadTodd on Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:21 pm

I wonder how many players, if given a choice, would opt for the NLL version? I had heard a few high profile players were not happy with the conditions in the MLL, including travel accomodations. But from the Journals of Alex, I have a feeling that player treatment may vary from team to team. It sounded like the Outlaws were treated pretty well, but the stories I heard were from Riptide players.
User avatar
BigheadTodd
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Rocklin

Postby James Foote on Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:13 am

After talking to a few players for the Colorado Mammoth, it sounds like the NLL owners will force their will upon their players that participate in both leagues, especially with Mammoth players. I could definitely see a buy-out happening in a couple of years if either league is able to stay on their feet.
James C. Foote
Head Men's Lacrosse Coach
University of Central Florida

e. JamesFooteUCF@gmail.com
t. @JamesFooteUCF
User avatar
James Foote
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:57 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby Brent Burns on Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:56 pm

With the latest Lacrosse Magazine that I received yesterday, LM interviewed Jim Jennings, NLL Commissioner, and he talked about a possibility of creating a NLL2, a feeder system similar to baseball and to hockey. He did talk briefly about forming a field lacrosse league under NLL. He talked about targeting Boston and Seattle as the next NLL franchises. He is thinking about expanding the league from 13 teams to 24 teams over the years.

All of that information is right there in the latest edition of Lacrosse Magazine.
Brent

a LSA Fan.
User avatar
Brent Burns
Coca-Cola Collector
Coca-Cola Collector
 
Posts: 2159
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: in the Hewitt

Postby byualum on Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:43 pm

James Foote wrote:After talking to a few players for the Colorado Mammoth, it sounds like the NLL owners will force their will upon their players that participate in both leagues, especially with Mammoth players. I could definitely see a buy-out happening in a couple of years if either league is able to stay on their feet.

That would be a big blow to the Outlaws, losing Langtry, Sims and Law would kill them at midfield, and if Matt Brown had to play with the Arizona franchise, they would be in big trouble.
BYU '96
Texas A&M '02
User avatar
byualum
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:23 pm
Location: Parker, CO


Return to National Lacrosse League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests