Losing to B team.

An open forum for all MCLA fans! Be sure your topic is not already covered by one of the other forums or it will be moved.

Postby Pinball on Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:06 pm

First of all the B Divison is great. In all honesty if there wasn't such a big deal that USD beat UCSD then this conversation would of never happen. If we start seeing it happening every week, maybe we need to reconsider the B Div. The B Div gives a school like ours with 1,800 undergrads to compete for a national championship as we understand and agree that we cannot probably beat or have a competitive game agaisnt the likes of CSU, BYU, Michigan etc..

What people need to understand is that anyone can beat any other team on any given day. USD probably played a great game, and UCSD probably didn't have a great game. (weekend before they played some close games in AZ, maybe they were a little tired)

We had this same discussion in the UMLL meeting on wheter or not Div A teams should be forced to play div b (as int he UMLL rules Div A must play 1 Div B team). I think we are all here to play competitive games, if the best team in your area or maybe a rivalry exist- why not play the game?? If that Div B team beats you according to the pollsters i have talked to- it dosent affect your ranking. So why not play that in-state rival or cross town foe? Are you scared of a tiny little B Divison Team??

Maple Leaf wrote: i would say that usd just played a bad game... as you can see in the A division, that happens quite a bit. No disrespect to st. johns, but if they played again i think usd would win that game by 5-6 goals.....


The reason why we won is because we were the better team on that day. What team hasn't improved since the first couple of games in the season?? See you in Texas!!
Jon Carlson
SJU Alum 07'

www.mcla.weebly.com
User avatar
Pinball
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Uptown


Postby SDSULAX on Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:59 pm

I think everyone is making too much out of a 1 goal victory, sure it is a win and for some a big win, but it is not a lower ranked team putting up 3 or 4 goals or doubling up on a higher ranked team. USD won, they got a shot off in the last seconds of the game, I watched it, they were truly inspired and played great, but if there was another 30 seconds on the clock, there is no telling what would of happened, they just ran out of time,we have all been there. I don't mean to or intend to diminish the victory, but it isn't like somebody was getting kicked around.
Craig Miller
General Manager San Diego State University Men's Lacrosse
Vice President WCLL
Director MCLA
Moderator WCLL Forum
User avatar
SDSULAX
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:10 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Postby lil lady lax fan on Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:17 pm

SDSULAX wrote:I think everyone is making too much out of a 1 goal victory, sure it is a win and for some a big win, but it is not a lower ranked team putting up 3 or 4 goals or doubling up on a higher ranked team. USD won, they got a shot off in the last seconds of the game, I watched it, they were truly inspired and played great, but if there was another 30 seconds on the clock, there is no telling what would of happened, they just ran out of time,we have all been there. I don't mean to or intend to diminish the victory, but it isn't like somebody was getting kicked around.


And that is partially the point. Folks are making such a big deal about UCSD getting beaten by what many percieve as a much lesser team. They tend to overlook San Diego's accomplishments and focus solely on the fact that they are a "B team" as if that were a bad thing. Yes they are a B team, capable of playing very good A teams and possibly beating them. If they were playing in the A division they would probably be in the middle of the pack, much like schools like Chapman, Utah or UMD who can throw a monkeywrench into the upper echelon's rankings by upsetting them. It's not consistent, but they do win the occasional match up with the big boys. They also tend to overlook the fact that this is a long-standing rivalry that has been around since before the A and B divisions were put into place. It's always been a fight to the end and hopefully the grudge match will continue to be played in the future.

USD has had a club team for twenty years and has been playing in the WCLL for quite some time. The same is true with Claremont who was one of the league's founding members way back in 1978. There are a lot of long-standing traditions and rivalries associated with the A and B teams in this league, probably more so than other younger leagues. Some of the traditional games played between the larger and smaller schools have been falling by the wayside, though, as A teams grow more and more reluctant to play the B teams due to the percieved stigma of a possible loss to a school in the "lesser" division and the effect that will have on their national rankings.

That's another large part of the problem--people's expectations of A teams versus B teams. As Bluevelvet stated the B division was not meant to be a developmental league. It was meant to serve as a competitive arena for schools who don't have the larger student base to draw from. They are capable of pulling in quality recruits, even recruits from the traditional hotbeds of Eastern lacrosse, though not to the extent of the larger powerhouse schools like UCSB, Michigan, UCLA, Arizona, Colorado...I think you get the picture. It was believed that eventually the top teams in the B division would be able toUnfortunately you also have the newest large-school teams joining the leagues (such as Oklahoma, Alabama and UNLV) having to play in the B division for a year before moving up, thus fueling the perception of it being a "feeder" division.

There is as much variability in the B division teams as there is in the A division teams. I don't think the top teams in either division should be faulted for trying to line up as competitive a schedule as they can. Playing a top team in the B division shouldn't be as big of a deal as folks make it out to be.

One thing I find very interesting is that the top two teams in the B division (USD and Claremont) find it necessary to take on opponents like UCSD and NDNU to prepare themselves for their next matchup in the divisional championships. Or that others in the top ten also line up games with the top A teams, like UVSC playing Utah, Arizona and Oregon; Northern Colorado taking on Colorado State; or St. John going up against UMD. Those top teams in the A division should be commended for trying to improve the quality of play in the B division not be crucified if the team they are playing gets the upper hand because they are playing an inspired game as SDSULAX so succinctly puts it. They are at the top of the B division for a reason--they are darned good ballers.

Pinball's right, the main objective is to play as competitively as you can, no matter what division you are in. Rivalries that cross divisional lines are also an important part of the various leagues. Teams should not be faulted for maintaining the cross-divisional games that have been a long-standing tradition.

Oh and Pinball, just a bit of a heads-up on the San Diego defense--since your visit in February they've found their happy place so watch out when next you meet in Texas!
Cathi Piccione
Rockhound and LAX aficionado
User avatar
lil lady lax fan
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: East of LA

Postby lil lady lax fan on Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:02 pm

I'd like to apologize for my rather lengthy rant. As many can tell this is a subject that really bothers me (OK, THAT was the understatement of the century... you can stop laughing now!). So, I will stop grousing and, instead, turn my attention toward providing a solution to this dilemma.

Suggesting that they move up to the A division is not the solution. We should be trying to keep these top ranked teams in the B division--it strengthens the division and will eventually make things more competitive as more OOC games are played. I know that, at least in the WCLL, there is a great disparity between the top two teams in the B division and the rest of the teams. This has been the case for the past few years. The increased number of OOC games has served to make things more competitive, but what can these teams do in the short run to make it more challenging? Maybe some of you folks in the A division could provide some suggestions.
Cathi Piccione
Rockhound and LAX aficionado
User avatar
lil lady lax fan
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: East of LA

Postby The Hammer on Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:23 pm

Just proves that any given team on any given day.
The Hammer
Water Boy
Water Boy
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: Seattle Wa

Losing to a B Team - Laxpower

Postby gamewatcher on Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:58 am

Re:

2. Laxpower has USD at 79.5. Just below Colorado and above Utah who both pulled off upsets this week.

Interesting that B teams get no quality win credit in the event of a victory over a ranked A team.
gamewatcher
Water Boy
Water Boy
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:14 pm

Postby gamewatcher on Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:15 am

Kyle Berggren wrote:Is 20K a small school?


I was shocked to see that USD has an enrollment this large. Per their website they are only 7,000.
gamewatcher
Water Boy
Water Boy
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:14 pm

Postby LaxRef on Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:00 pm

laxdad11 wrote:
Kyle Berggren wrote:Is 20K a small school?


I was shocked to see that USD has an enrollment this large. Per their website they are only 7,000.


There's University of San Diego and University of South Dakota, both called USD. That might be the source of the confusion.
-LaxRef
User avatar
LaxRef
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:18 am

Postby lil lady lax fan on Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:01 pm

I think Kyle was pointing out that some of the schools that don't have 1A football teams are still fairly good sized. I don't think he was referring to San Diego in particular, though San Diego's football team is 1-AA I believe.
Cathi Piccione
Rockhound and LAX aficionado
User avatar
lil lady lax fan
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: East of LA

Postby usdlax8 on Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:44 am

to clarify things, our school actually has a current undergrad standing of just under 5,000 students and we aren't allowed to play grad students unless they went to usd as an undergrad which is in accordance with the wcll.
User avatar
usdlax8
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 6:49 pm
Location: San Diego

Postby Sonny on Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:54 am

usdlax8 wrote:we aren't allowed to play grad students unless they went to usd as an undergrad which is in accordance with the wcll.


Neither is anyone other team in the MDIA. That rule is not unique to the WCLL.
Webmaster
Image
Image
User avatar
Sonny
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8183
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby beckner11 on Sun Apr 23, 2006 10:14 am

3rdPersonPlural wrote:It may make sense to set up the A and B leagues to realign yearly, as per the model of the English Premier Soccer leagues.

Every year, the top 5 or 10 B teams move up to A, and the bottom 5 or 10 A teams drop down to B.



This will never happen as long as teams are funded by the players. Some teams just can't handle the extra expenses throughout the course of a full season. Also, I feel that a team that won B would have the right to stick around and defend their title the next year.

I can already hear it now if that were the system....... "well we had to move up to A this year otherwise we would have won the whole thing again. We should of been playing in the championship!"
User avatar
beckner11
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: Springfield, MO

Postby Gvlax on Sun May 07, 2006 1:10 am

Last time i checked my school (grand valley state university) had 22,000. Its a big Div 2 school. Probably why they dominate in Div 2 sports. I think they had 4 national titles this year ( Football, volleyball, water polo, womens basketball).
User avatar
Gvlax
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 664
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Postby Kyle Berggren on Sun May 07, 2006 2:53 am

LaxRef wrote:
laxdad11 wrote:
Kyle Berggren wrote:Is 20K a small school?


I was shocked to see that USD has an enrollment this large. Per their website they are only 7,000.


There's University of San Diego and University of South Dakota, both called USD. That might be the source of the confusion.


Sorry I didn't catch this post earlier, but I was referring to several schools in the B that are large (for instance UVSC). Large isn't the split, Division 1 football is the split. Not too much other than that, but a team of 3.5K versus a team of 20K (not necessarly UVSC, a very classy group of guys we'd love to play again) is not always the split many seem to think of... Many A schools don't have that kind of enrollment, neither will they in the future. Football is not the best split in my eyes, but it was the smallest wave to create.
PNCLL Treasurer
User avatar
Kyle Berggren
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Postby USDLAX5 on Mon May 08, 2006 11:48 am

Total enrollment:
Univ. South Dakota -- 8641
Univ. San Diego -- around 7000

*numbers found on each school's website
Justin Raders
South Dakota Lacrosse
Alum #5
lacrosse@usd.edu
User avatar
USDLAX5
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 5:04 pm
Location: Vermillion, SD

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


cron