BOWL PICK'em

Non-lacrosse specific topics.

Postby FLAK on Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:50 pm

well im on the verge of going 0-2 today, i think the fact that the holiday bowl is so close shows just how bad the pac-10 really is...
User avatar
FLAK
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:59 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO


Postby shrekjr on Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:12 am

FLAK wrote:well im on the verge of going 0-2 today, i think the fact that the holiday bowl is so close shows just how bad the pac-10 really is...

When it rains, it pours. I lost both games today too.
User avatar
shrekjr
Old ugly deaf blind ref
Old ugly deaf blind ref
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Texas

Postby whitcd on Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:02 am

Sonny wrote:Discussion of the Alamo Bowl officiating and the "final play"
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls05/n ... id=2274608

No penalties were called on the play, but David Parry, NCAA national coordinator of football officials and coordinator of officials for the Big Ten said Thursday that both teams should have been penalized for extra people on the field.


So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?
User avatar
whitcd
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:09 pm
Location: Mankato

Postby shrekjr on Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:08 am

whitcd wrote:So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?

No, offsetting penalties result in the down being replayed, unless both fouls are considered Unsportsmanlike Conduct in which case they are "live ball fouls treated as dead ball fouls". But in this case, too many men on the field, illegal substitution, and sideline interference are all live ball fouls that should have drawn offsetting penalties.
User avatar
shrekjr
Old ugly deaf blind ref
Old ugly deaf blind ref
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Texas

Postby bste_lax on Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:50 am

They went over on Sportscenter the things the refs could have called with my personal favorite being Nebraska "committed an unfair act" and could have awarded Michigan a touchdown which would be crazy. Probably one of those old rules still in there.

Random side note, boy did Oregon prove tonight that they should have been in the BCS....... :wink:
Matt Benson
University of Iowa Alum
#6 - (2000-2004)
User avatar
bste_lax
Uncle Rico Wanna-Be
Uncle Rico Wanna-Be
 
Posts: 2353
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby laxative on Fri Dec 30, 2005 4:14 am

bste_lax wrote:Random side note, boy did Oregon prove tonight that they should have been in the BCS....... :wink:


Another sub-par PAC-10 performance. Not too good for the conference. I'm sick of teams crying about not gettin' in to the BCS( a la CAL) and then folding like a cheap suit. Even though Oregon was playing without their starting QB they need step up for these big bowls or the PAC-10 will never get the BCS respect...outside of #1.
Image
User avatar
laxative
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Newport Beach

Postby laxfan25 on Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:07 am

We need Ali to give us the updates - I'm too lazy to figure out who's in the lead.
While Oregon might have been playing without their starting QB, it was the dismal play of their line on both sides of the ball that really stood out. They were embarrassed by the Sooners - getting blown out all over.
Hmm, I wonder how this bodes for the USC/Texas matchup??
User avatar
laxfan25
Scoop, Cradle, & Rock!
Scoop, Cradle, & Rock!
 
Posts: 1952
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:06 pm

Postby DanGenck on Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:26 am

shrekjr wrote:
whitcd wrote:So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?

No, offsetting penalties result in the down being replayed, unless both fouls are considered Unsportsmanlike Conduct in which case they are "live ball fouls treated as dead ball fouls". But in this case, too many men on the field, illegal substitution, and sideline interference are all live ball fouls that should have drawn offsetting penalties.


Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.
User avatar
DanGenck
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:26 pm

Postby Sonny on Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:47 am

DanGenck wrote:
shrekjr wrote:
whitcd wrote:So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?

No, offsetting penalties result in the down being replayed, unless both fouls are considered Unsportsmanlike Conduct in which case they are "live ball fouls treated as dead ball fouls". But in this case, too many men on the field, illegal substitution, and sideline interference are all live ball fouls that should have drawn offsetting penalties.


Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.


I don't know with 100% certainty, but I don't think a game can expire/end with any type of defensive penalty.
Webmaster
Image
Image
User avatar
Sonny
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8183
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby shrekjr on Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:19 am

DanGenck wrote:Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.

Now you're going to make me look it up. Get back to you later on that one.
User avatar
shrekjr
Old ugly deaf blind ref
Old ugly deaf blind ref
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Texas

Postby culax on Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:33 am

DanGenck wrote:
Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.


i think dan is right. at least woody and skip from cold pizza said so this morning.
Will Gilner
Creighton Lacrosse
Millarard West Lacrosse
creightonlax[at]netzero[dot]com
User avatar
culax
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Omaha, Nebraska

Postby shrekjr on Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:47 am

I don't ever trust an announcer or any other TV person. The last time I saw them quote a rule that was put up on the screen, they were showing and quoting the wrong rule!
User avatar
shrekjr
Old ugly deaf blind ref
Old ugly deaf blind ref
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Texas

Postby DanGenck on Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:12 pm

culax wrote:
DanGenck wrote:
Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.


i think dan is right. at least woody and skip from cold pizza said so this morning.


The offsetting penalities would be for the same infraction- Too many people on the field. Had Michigan stayed off the field, they would have legitimate beef about having one more play to run from the 15 yard line.
User avatar
DanGenck
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:26 pm

Postby laxative on Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:51 pm

laxfan25 wrote:Hmm, I wonder how this bodes for the USC/Texas matchup??


I hope it bodes just like it did last year when Cal was embarrassed by Big12 Texas Tech :lol:
Image
User avatar
laxative
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Newport Beach

Postby FLAK on Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:52 pm

UCLA is losing by 22 points and the first quarter isnt even over...the Pac-10 has to be the worst BCS conference without a doubt, i would seriously like to see what USC could do in a legitimate conference....AND UVA pulls it off baby, oh yeah!!!
User avatar
FLAK
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:59 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO

PreviousNext

Return to Water Cooler

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests