BOWL PICK'em
Sonny wrote:Discussion of the Alamo Bowl officiating and the "final play"
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls05/n ... id=2274608No penalties were called on the play, but David Parry, NCAA national coordinator of football officials and coordinator of officials for the Big Ten said Thursday that both teams should have been penalized for extra people on the field.
So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?
-
whitcd - Premium
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:09 pm
- Location: Mankato
whitcd wrote:So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?
No, offsetting penalties result in the down being replayed, unless both fouls are considered Unsportsmanlike Conduct in which case they are "live ball fouls treated as dead ball fouls". But in this case, too many men on the field, illegal substitution, and sideline interference are all live ball fouls that should have drawn offsetting penalties.
-
shrekjr - Old ugly deaf blind ref
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Texas
They went over on Sportscenter the things the refs could have called with my personal favorite being Nebraska "committed an unfair act" and could have awarded Michigan a touchdown which would be crazy. Probably one of those old rules still in there.
Random side note, boy did Oregon prove tonight that they should have been in the BCS.......
Random side note, boy did Oregon prove tonight that they should have been in the BCS.......
Matt Benson
University of Iowa Alum
#6 - (2000-2004)
University of Iowa Alum
#6 - (2000-2004)
-
bste_lax - Uncle Rico Wanna-Be
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:42 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
bste_lax wrote:Random side note, boy did Oregon prove tonight that they should have been in the BCS.......
Another sub-par PAC-10 performance. Not too good for the conference. I'm sick of teams crying about not gettin' in to the BCS( a la CAL) and then folding like a cheap suit. Even though Oregon was playing without their starting QB they need step up for these big bowls or the PAC-10 will never get the BCS respect...outside of #1.
-
laxative - All-Conference
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:11 pm
- Location: Newport Beach
We need Ali to give us the updates - I'm too lazy to figure out who's in the lead.
While Oregon might have been playing without their starting QB, it was the dismal play of their line on both sides of the ball that really stood out. They were embarrassed by the Sooners - getting blown out all over.
Hmm, I wonder how this bodes for the USC/Texas matchup??
While Oregon might have been playing without their starting QB, it was the dismal play of their line on both sides of the ball that really stood out. They were embarrassed by the Sooners - getting blown out all over.
Hmm, I wonder how this bodes for the USC/Texas matchup??
-
laxfan25 - Scoop, Cradle, & Rock!
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:06 pm
shrekjr wrote:whitcd wrote:So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?
No, offsetting penalties result in the down being replayed, unless both fouls are considered Unsportsmanlike Conduct in which case they are "live ball fouls treated as dead ball fouls". But in this case, too many men on the field, illegal substitution, and sideline interference are all live ball fouls that should have drawn offsetting penalties.
Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.
-
DanGenck - All-America
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:26 pm
DanGenck wrote:shrekjr wrote:whitcd wrote:So IF both teams were penalized for 12 men on the field, wouldn't the penalites offset and the game would be over anyways?
No, offsetting penalties result in the down being replayed, unless both fouls are considered Unsportsmanlike Conduct in which case they are "live ball fouls treated as dead ball fouls". But in this case, too many men on the field, illegal substitution, and sideline interference are all live ball fouls that should have drawn offsetting penalties.
Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.
I don't know with 100% certainty, but I don't think a game can expire/end with any type of defensive penalty.
-
Sonny - Site Admin
- Posts: 8183
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
DanGenck wrote:
Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.
i think dan is right. at least woody and skip from cold pizza said so this morning.
Will Gilner
Creighton Lacrosse
Millarard West Lacrosse
creightonlax[at]netzero[dot]com
Creighton Lacrosse
Millarard West Lacrosse
creightonlax[at]netzero[dot]com
-
culax - Premium
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:18 pm
- Location: Omaha, Nebraska
culax wrote:DanGenck wrote:
Offsetting penalties as the clock expires ends the game.
i think dan is right. at least woody and skip from cold pizza said so this morning.
The offsetting penalities would be for the same infraction- Too many people on the field. Had Michigan stayed off the field, they would have legitimate beef about having one more play to run from the 15 yard line.
-
DanGenck - All-America
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:26 pm
UCLA is losing by 22 points and the first quarter isnt even over...the Pac-10 has to be the worst BCS conference without a doubt, i would seriously like to see what USC could do in a legitimate conference....AND UVA pulls it off baby, oh yeah!!!
-
FLAK - All-Conference
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:59 pm
- Location: Saint Louis, MO
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests