Sonoma's Roster

Sonoma's Roster

Postby the lax on Tue Aug 09, 2005 12:36 pm

Is it me or does there roster seem small (29) for such a dominate program?
User avatar
the lax
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Original 13 Colony lax


Postby CATLAX MAN on Tue Aug 09, 2005 1:01 pm

It's you. It's quality, not quantity that matters.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Sonoma's Roster

Postby mholtz on Tue Aug 09, 2005 1:31 pm

the lax wrote:Is it me or does there roster seem small (29) for such a dominate program?


I believe Oakland made it to the big dance a few years back with about 17 players on their roster.
Matt Holtz
Head Coach, University of Detroit-Mercy
CollegeLAX.us developer/admin.
User avatar
mholtz
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:12 am
Location: East Lansing, MI

Postby CATLAX MAN on Tue Aug 09, 2005 1:44 pm

Simon Fraser also has gone to the tourney with a small roster. A small roster can be a drawback in a 4 day tournament as fatigue does become a factor.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby TrojanLaxman5 on Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:27 pm

29 quality players is more than enough, even for the tourney. It can be much more detrimental to a team to allow almost anyone to play on the team and have a roster of 40-45 than it is to have 25-30 of the best, most committed players who really want to be there.

The USA West teams also seem to do pretty well, they only have 25 or so players, play games about everyday, or multiple games/day, and still kick butt. We played 17 games in 20 days in Japan/China in 04' and went 16-1 with 25 guys.
Brian Rothenberg
University of Southern California Men's Lacrosse
Class of 2005
www.usclacrosse.com
User avatar
TrojanLaxman5
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:12 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby CATLAX MAN on Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:46 pm

TrojanLaxman5 wrote:29 quality players is more than enough, even for the tourney. It can be much more detrimental to a team to allow almost anyone to play on the team and have a roster of 40-45 than it is to have 25-30 of the best, most committed players who really want to be there.


I would agree with that. UCSB had a roster of 40+ for the last couple of years and one of the problems they encountered was getting enough quality practice time for the players. With a roster that size, you are running drills 4, 5 & 6 lines deep. Large rosters also create more of an administrative headache sometimes.

Simon Fraser had considerably less players than 29 at the tourney a few years back. I want to say it was in the neighborhood of 16-19 players, but I'm not sure.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby PNWLaxer on Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:37 am

In 2001 I believe SFU went to STL with a roster of 14 in 2003 it was 16 or 17 in 2004 it was about 20.
PNWLaxer
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:14 am

Postby the lax on Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:50 am

Simon Fraser doesn't have to earn their way to the tournament like Sonoma does in going through the WCLL.
User avatar
the lax
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Original 13 Colony lax

Postby Timbalaned on Thu Aug 11, 2005 3:44 pm

the lax wrote:Simon Fraser doesn't have to earn their way to the tournament like Sonoma does in going through the WCLL.


they do now...
User avatar
Timbalaned
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: OREGON

Postby CATLAX MAN on Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:23 pm

When was the last time that Sonoma missed the tourney? I don't know the answer, but it was a long time ago, if ever. There is no comparing Sonoma to Simon Fraser. Sorry.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby slider on Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:04 am

I disagree. There is a reason that most major programs carry 40+ players. Depth in practice and the ability to develop talent are huge assets to a team. In order to get through an entire season with injuries, illness, class conflicts, etc. you need enough guys to maintain a good level of competition at practice. It can be done with less, but it's definitely a plus to have a large roster.
slider
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:49 pm

Postby the lax on Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:41 am

Oakland is another tournament team with a small roster.
User avatar
the lax
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Original 13 Colony lax


Return to MCLA D1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


cron