Powell Brothers in legal war With Warrior Lacrosse

An open forum for all MCLA fans! Be sure your topic is not already covered by one of the other forums or it will be moved.

Postby byualum on Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:00 pm

onpoint wrote:Keep in mind that e-lacrosse employs the Powells, so it behooves them to write the Powells in a favorable light.


Sure...but I bet a lot of people view e-lacrosse as an unbiased source of lacrosse news and that simply is not the case.

I coach 23 7th-graders...they all know about Warrior, only about half know who the Powells are.

..."behooves" is a cool word.
BYU '96
Texas A&M '02
User avatar
byualum
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:23 pm
Location: Parker, CO


Postby Sonny on Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:36 pm

byualum wrote:
onpoint wrote:Keep in mind that e-lacrosse employs the Powells, so it behooves them to write the Powells in a favorable light.


Sure...but I bet a lot of people view e-lacrosse as an unbiased source of lacrosse news and that simply is not the case.

I coach 23 7th-graders...they all know about Warrior, only about half know who the Powells are.

..."behooves" is a cool word.


Yeah, but do they know what USLIA.com is? :P
Webmaster
Image
Image
User avatar
Sonny
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8183
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby byualum on Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:51 pm

Sonny wrote:
byualum wrote:
onpoint wrote:Keep in mind that e-lacrosse employs the Powells, so it behooves them to write the Powells in a favorable light.


Sure...but I bet a lot of people view e-lacrosse as an unbiased source of lacrosse news and that simply is not the case.

I coach 23 7th-graders...they all know about Warrior, only about half know who the Powells are.

..."behooves" is a cool word.


Yeah, but do they know what USLIA.com is? :P


My kids?? Yeah they know, and they give me a hard time about playing at BYU but always referring to the way CSU plays (we took the team to the CU/CSU game - easy point of reference).
BYU '96
Texas A&M '02
User avatar
byualum
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:23 pm
Location: Parker, CO

Postby LaxRef on Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:53 pm

hoyaslax18 wrote: if you ask a young kid just starting to play lacrosse which equipment he'd wear, "Warrior or Brine?", how many kids do you know will say WARRIOR! The brand name works wonders for that company.


If marketing can convince people to pay $2 to buy one brand of bottled tap water over another, then marketing can convince them that one stick is superior to another, even if it isn't.
-LaxRef
User avatar
LaxRef
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:18 am

Postby Danny Hogan on Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:55 pm

byualum wrote:I coach 23 7th-graders...they all know about Warrior, only about half know who the Powells are.



but they probably also don't know about the crapola product warrior produced in the pre-powell-era. Anyone still have a warrior diablo?
Danny Hogan
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1811
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:50 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby onpoint on Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:09 pm

Hey, the Diablo is what started it all! First curved head ever. You can thank one Mr. Flip Naumburg for that . . .
Always on point . . .

Alex Smith
CSU Lacrosse '03
User avatar
onpoint
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:28 am
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Postby Andy Sharp on Thu Jun 23, 2005 5:59 pm

I am sitting in the RIP home office right now, in the presence of the patent of infamy, for the first curved head, the Warrior Cobra. Even if it was a first step, it set a legal precedent and apparently you might not see a head or two on the market anymore, now that the lawyers are taking action.

Alex, K-Train says, "you've been punked".
User avatar
Andy Sharp
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

Postby onpoint on Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:59 pm

You can tell "K-Train," you've been fattened . . . I forgot that it was the Cobra, not the Diablo
Always on point . . .

Alex Smith
CSU Lacrosse '03
User avatar
onpoint
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:28 am
Location: Fort Collins, CO

Postby Danny Hogan on Thu Jun 23, 2005 8:48 pm

the diablo was the one that offset but never leveled out. Kinda just bent backwards, made scooping impossible. hands down worst piece of lacrosse equipment ever created.
Danny Hogan
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1811
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:50 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby stickdoctor on Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:33 pm

Danny Hogan wrote:the diablo was the one that offset but never leveled out. Kinda just bent backwards, made scooping impossible. hands down worst piece of lacrosse equipment ever created.



ummm, nope. That was the scorpion. That one disappeared very quickly. You could set one up to throw decently and it suited certain styles of players.....but it was impossible to have a pocket of any depth and still be legal.

Diablo was a curved head....basically generation 2 of Cobra. Very different than the Cobra....much straighter sidewalls, full 2 inch sidewall, pinched shape (well, when compared to the Cobra, anyway...). There were some problems with how tightly warrior made them in terms of the rules....I can remember having to cut the ball stop down in thickness to make the head legal after a 3 min call for the head being too short from tip of scroop to top of ball stop.


Diablo:
Image

Cobra:
Image
stickdoctor
Water Boy
Water Boy
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:50 pm

Postby Danny Hogan on Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:28 am

i stand corrected. the scorpion is the worst piece of lacrosse equipment ever made.
Danny Hogan
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1811
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:50 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


cron