I think my favorite headline from all this is from reddit.com:
The Senator with the Hooker Problem and the Senator with the Wide Stance Have Teamed Up to Save the Institution of Marriage
The Senator with the Hooker Problem and the Senator with the Wide Stance Have Teamed Up to Save the Institution of Marriage
Steno wrote:That's the silliest thing I've heard in a while.
I would love one person to come up with a defensible reason why the institution of marriage needs protection from homosexuals. I don't care if you're a republican't, democry-baby, or whatever, just please someone tell me what the heck is wrong with two men or two women having a state-recognized union that is precisely similar in both name and privileges as what the heteros enjoy.
Oh, and the Bible doesn't count, as it does not speak to this issue.
Come on, someone out in the lax interwebs has to disagree with me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests