Check This....

Postby henrij4 on Thu Apr 14, 2005 1:16 pm

Putting on the eye black is definitly a personal choice, and many players do get creative with it which adds some intimidation on some players. It would be funny if someone pulled out the old school John Randle batman paint around the eyes. But about the glare if properly used it can reduce glare into the eyes but that all depends on the amount of sunlight there is on that day.
Jason Henrickson
MSU-Mankato
Assistant Coach

"Look no further ya found him"
User avatar
henrij4
Rookie
Rookie
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Mankato, MN


Postby Dylan Dickey on Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:15 pm

Here's a picture of Cory Rada, pregame vs. Duluth at St. Cloud.

Image
User avatar
Dylan Dickey
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 9:59 pm
Location: Mankato, Mn

Postby laxfan25 on Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:12 pm

I'm Batman!!
User avatar
laxfan25
Scoop, Cradle, & Rock!
Scoop, Cradle, & Rock!
 
Posts: 1952
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:06 pm

Postby mnref on Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:08 am

Rob Graff wrote:Sonny:

The official in question informed me that by putting inverted triangles under their eyes, my players were either violating rules on uniform standards, or skirting the boundry (on the wrong side) of an unsportsmanlike penalty. Mind you, they players were emulating exactly what Powell did.

I raised it with the Assigner at the time, and I'm fairly certain he addressed it with the official, as I didn't get the same warning from the official in the next game he did.

Rob


Somewhere way back in my memory I remember a discussion about prohibiting players from wearing "intimidating" face paint but in high school not college games. I also recall that it was an National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) rule not NCAA. I looked through the NFHS rule book and found nothing so I can't confirm it.

The NFHS rules include even more little stuff than the NCAA rules like the prohibition on jewelery. If you want to be completely confused, try reading the requirements for removable cleats in the NFHS rules.

This year the NFHS added two rules that had many of us shaking our heads: First, they have asked officials to make sure the players stay on their own half of the field during warm ups. No taking a lap of the field to warm-up, you'll have to go around your half of the field twice instead.

The NFHS has added a form of coach's challenge to the rules this year - if a coach thinks an official has misapplied a rule, he can ask for a review but risks using a time out in the process. I haven't had any coach try it yet but it could get interesting. Wouldn't that be interesting if it were in the NCAA rules...

Matt
mnref
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:27 pm

Postby John Paul on Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:05 am

Hey Matt,

I'm not sure if it should be in the rule book, but it's always been a pet peeve of mine when a team takes their warmup lap on the other team's half of the field. It's just common courtesy not to do that. Most teams follow that unwritten rule (now unwritten at the NCAA level only, I guess), but there always seems to be one each year that does it to us. It always fires us up. The vast majority of teams understand that it's appropriate to keep to their half. Now if we could just get the vast majority of drivers to understand they're not supposed to cruise in the left lane...

The second rule, about the challenges, seems like a good idea on the surface, but I can't imagine actually executing it. The rules are hard enough to interpret in certain areas - if one of those vague areas is challenged, how do you come to a conclusion on the field between officials and coaches? You'd have to have an abitrator. Maybe that should be added to the crew: referee, umpire, field judge, arbitrator/rules interpreter. He can replace the CBO.

JP
Head Coach, Michigan Men's Lacrosse
President, MCLA
User avatar
John Paul
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan

Postby Sonny on Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:16 am

Regarding the "Coaches Challenge" in NFHS rules - if they want to stop play to question a judgment call -- Then they have used one of their timeouts. (If they have no timeouts remaining, then you can enforce a technical foul against the In-Home.)

The only time they can challenge a rule successfully is if they think a rule is misapplied. Judgement calls are not subject to review and if the call stands as originally applied then a timeout is charged to the team/coach request the rule review.
Webmaster
Image
Image
User avatar
Sonny
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8183
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby Sandwich8 on Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:40 am

umdulax1 wrote:I always wear eyeblack other than back in the day at practice but I do think it helps with the glare of the sun into your eyes and it was a just something I did before every game.


And if I recall correctly it left you looking like Alice Cooper for at least the next week...just kidding buddy
User avatar
Sandwich8
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:54 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Postby The1 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:53 am

You know, I was actually approached by a ref before the game as I was getting ready, and he asked me personally not to use the eye paint. He said it was because it would only tarnish a man of my natural intimidation. Plus, sammy used to use enough for the both of us.

Go bulldogs. :evil:
Rectum? Damn near Killed'em!!!
User avatar
The1
Water Boy
Water Boy
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:48 pm

Postby umdulax1 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:45 am

oopsss :roll:
Sam Litman
Head Coach
University of Minnesota-Duluth
www.umdlacrosse.com
@duluthlacrosse
User avatar
umdulax1
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 338
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:55 pm
Location: Duluth, MN

Postby Adam G on Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:43 am

We played a GLLC game against some tiny team and one of their defensemen had sharpied 'hit you' under his eyes. We won that game 13-0.
EC Lacrosse Alum '06
User avatar
Adam G
Ain't as good as I once was
Ain't as good as I once was
 
Posts: 582
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Living in a shotgun shack

Previous

Return to MCLA D1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests