Girls on MDIA teams

An open forum for all MCLA fans! Be sure your topic is not already covered by one of the other forums or it will be moved.

Postby canders23 on Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:00 am

That is a fact, and yes if you do not recieve funds from the gov't you are exempt.
Chad Andersen
St. Cloud State Huskies '99
User avatar
canders23
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:35 am
Location: Minnetonka, MN


Postby Daniel Morris on Mon Apr 11, 2005 9:19 am

Question about Title IX, is it true their doesn't need to be an equal amount of sports but a proportional one tot he amount of males/females in the student body?
Daniel Morris
MCLA National Tournament Director
Treasurer, Pioneer Collegiate Lacrosse League
dmorris29@comcast.net
User avatar
Daniel Morris
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:35 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Postby Chris Larson on Mon Apr 11, 2005 9:24 am

When you employ a metric that requires direct measurement, the gender ratio is a factor in the equation. There are other metrics to show compliance with TitleIx, but because they are not easily measured, institutions tend to shy away from them.

CL
Last edited by Chris Larson on Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chris Larson

District 7 Lacrosse Official
SFO - Upper Midwest Lacrosse Conference
Treasurer - Upper Midwest Lacrosse Officials Association
General Manager - Team MN Lacrosse
Boy's Coaching Coordinator - St Paul Youth Lacrosse
User avatar
Chris Larson
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: St Paul, MN

Postby John Paul on Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:49 pm

Virtually all private schools fall under Title IX because they receive some federal funds in the form of research grants and scholarships.
Head Coach, Michigan Men's Lacrosse
President, MCLA
User avatar
John Paul
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan

Postby WheatonFan on Tue Apr 12, 2005 6:41 pm

Interesting.......Cornell College had a girl when I helped them out at end of last Spring. I talked to their coach, former Iowa player, this past fall who said they were told that she couldn't play by someone within USL MDIA.
_________________
Matt Benson
University of Iowa Alum
#6 - (2000-2004)


As of this fall at the GRLC conference Cornell was still planning on having a few girls play for them. But then again they also said they were going to have 30 players...we're all optimistic about our numbers though.
WheatonFan
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 6:17 pm

Postby MackLax on Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:59 pm

MountaineerLax wrote:
YESIAMAGIRL wrote:Title IX ROCKS!!!

This is really hard for me (as a woman-athlete who all of my life has had to deal with discrimination and getting crap for playing with the guys) to admit that Title IX has run its course. It was a wonderful thing and I would not be the person I am today without it. But its really sad to see that its actually starting to hurt men's sports.


JUST NOW STARTING TO HURT MEN'S SPORTS?? Where have you been the last 30 years?? Title IX has been hurting men's sports SINCE IT'S INCEPTION! It is a terrible system, everyone knows it, but no one has come up with anything better!

FACTS:

Of the close to 200 NCAA Men's Football Teams - only 2 lose money.


Where are you getting this fact? Find me a 1-AA team that makes money. Many of them lose several million dollars per year. D2 and D3 football are also extremely poor investments.


Every other sport, men's and women's, loses money.


Some game that this guy Naismith invented brings in a few bucks here and there.

The most popular men's sport: Football - Roster Size of 100 - Avg. Scholarships on each team (which are also Title IX restricted) around 80.


80 is not the average. It is the max allowed on 1-A football teams. I think the max in 1-AA is 60 and something like 36 for D2. Once again this is the maximum allowed, not the average.


When Title IX went into effect schools were put into a position to either add more women's teams (that all lose money) or cut men's teams (which also lose money) - which one makes more since financially? Hense there are less than 40 NCAA Div. 1 Men's Lacrosse Teams left. That's just sad!


Wrong, there are over 50 D1 teams.


Title IX has set up men's sports to fail - plain and simple!


Title IX addresses any federally funded educational program, not just sports programs. It has been around for a long time and was focused on so many more things than organized athletics. Not that I am happy with how this plan tends to limit the expansion of big time NCAA men's lacrosse, but the main culprit of this lack of expansion is that most AD's are football or basketball guys. Not very many of them are going to dole out their pennies for lacrosse, since most AD's are not lacrosse guys.

Instead of pointing the finger at a program that aims to allow equal benefit for all parties, blame the people who are authorizing ridiculous miscellaneous expenditures of a football or basketball program that would exceed the cost of an entire varsity men's lacrosse program. Remember that football has several full-time coaching staff members not to mention all the little dollars spent here and there on each of the 50+ rostered team members no matter what division you are talking about. And often much money is being spent on players who don't even dress on gamedays.
MackLax
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:28 pm

Postby MountaineerLax on Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:48 am

Most of my information was attained from the Denver Post in 2002 (the 30 year anniversary series they published). And until just about 3 years ago there were only 36 NCAA D1 Lacrosse Teams - since then more have been added I guess.

My next question is... if Title IX affects federally funded programs (which I know it does - including athletics and academics) why doesn't it affect our club status? I mean, we're all club because we can avoid Title IX and most of us get at least some money (varying between teams) from our student fees, student government, or club sports dept. - which is essentially being channeled through a federally funded system... so why no pressure from Title IX on "club"?
Dave Leach
Website / Media - RMLAX.com

Western State College Alumni '03
User avatar
MountaineerLax
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Postby Danny Hogan on Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:26 pm

it still does affect the club status. There are no football club teams gobbling up 90% of the support on our side. Generally with club teams you have a women's sport to balance out the men's side.

Title 9 is a great theory, the implementation is flawed. Football needs to be taken out of the balance, that or we need to start a d1 womens football league.
Danny Hogan
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1811
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:50 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby John Paul on Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:27 pm

There have been over 50 NCAA D1 programs for many, many years. That number dropped down to the low 50s a few years ago, and has since bumped back up with the addition of 3 D1 programs this year. Maybe the Denver Post needs to take a look at their fact checkers. They were way off.

Technically Title IX does effect club sports. Club sports support probably just hasn't been challenged yet in court.
Head Coach, Michigan Men's Lacrosse
President, MCLA
User avatar
John Paul
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan

Postby Sonny on Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:31 pm

John Paul wrote: Technically Title IX does effect club sports. Club sports support probably just hasn't been challenged yet in court.


Q: Do you think title IX would effect sports clubs that are entirely self-funded? (i.e. they don't get a single dime from said institution).
Webmaster
Image
Image
User avatar
Sonny
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8183
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby Danny Hogan on Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:45 pm

i think they would actually. i think we had a thread on this before 'the hack' and someone mentioned the self-funded d1 marquette wrestling squad that got axed. I don't see how club status would be any different.
Danny Hogan
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1811
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:50 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby YESIAMAGIRL on Wed Apr 13, 2005 4:54 pm

Title 9 is a great theory, the implementation is flawed. Football needs to be taken out of the balance, that or we need to start a d1 womens football league.


Count me in on that one!!! :lol:
Must be fun to be an otter
YESIAMAGIRL
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:08 pm

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests