RealisticObserver wrote:That was the frist win at the national tourney in the first round ever for UMD. Kind of emotional to get that monkey off your back.
Granted the rankings were UMD 6 and Sonoma 11, but I think everyone was speculating on that UMD #6 ranking and felt it could have easily been flip flopped.
Lets not forget Oregon is #3, so them getting out to a 6-1 lead should be a big surprise either. The response by UMD in the 2nd quarter is going the right direction.
Can't have it both ways. In the first paragraph you're discounting the premise that UMD was supposed to win based on seeding, implying that seeding isn't a valid predictor of the favorite and that UMD (the "underdog") would be justified in being "hungover".
Second para you're insinuating that the Ducks lead is expected because they are the higher seed and thus are supposed to win.
Which is it? Are higher seeds supposed to win or should you throw out the seeds after the initial face off?