has anyone read anything about smart tuft [or smarturf]
sounds like some pretty cool stuff where the lines on the field can be changed by computer or something
Smart Turf
21 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Smart Turf
"Load the Wagon"
-
LAXDawg14 - All-Conference
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 10:32 am
- Location: Athens, GA
That looks pretty cool. Found an article about the stuff I think you are talking about :
http://www.sportexe.com/turf_news_forbes_article.htm
http://www.sportexe.com/turf_news_forbes_article.htm
-
Campbell - All-Conference
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:57 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Very cool. Here is the direct link to the Forbes article:
http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2006/1127/058.html
http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2006/1127/058.html
But Sportexe, 40% owned by former Baltimore Ravens owner Art Modell, believes the future of turf is interactive. Here's how its "turf TV" works: A computer sends an image to the field, where it is distributed among 1,750 interconnected square trays, 7.5 feet on a side, that host their own light processing circuitry. Thousands of blades of polyethylene grass, blended with optical fibers, reflect light upward from the trays. It's like a computer monitor that you can walk on. A football field would have 128 million pixels, which works out to 1,280 per square foot. In pixels per square foot it can't hold a candle to your television set; in total pixels it's well ahead.
Unlike your flat screen at home, this display is equipped to withstand the impact of a 380-pound lineman. The blades are conducting light, not electricity, so athletes can't be electrocuted on rainy days, even if they're losing badly.
At $1.5 million, the purchase price of an interactive field will be three times that of an unilluminated in-fill field and eight times that of a natural grass field. But Sportexe's Nicholls points out that the ten-year maintenance bill on grass can approach $1 million, 20 times the cost of maintaining an in-fill field. A stadium owner may be able to pay the mortgage on the interactive grass with ad revenue or host more events if the field lines can be changed so easily and rapidly.
Nicholls says the lit-up fields are still two years away from commercialization. The technology, though, is already being employed, most notably on artificial Christmas trees.
"The technology isn't really that amazing," he says. "It's just that no one's done it on a field yet."
-
Sonny - Site Admin
- Posts: 8183
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Cool stuff...I can see a lot of benefits from this:
1. On field 1st down markers
2. Animated mascots/logos
and the biggie
3. Advertising.
I can see Nationwide shelling out big money to put a picture of K-Fed all up in thurr.
1. On field 1st down markers
2. Animated mascots/logos
and the biggie
3. Advertising.
I can see Nationwide shelling out big money to put a picture of K-Fed all up in thurr.
Barry Badrinath: Oh man, that's the most disgusting thing I've ever drank.
Landfill: I doubt that very much, playboy
Landfill: I doubt that very much, playboy
-
Beta - Big Fan of Curves
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:00 pm
- Location: A-Town Stay Down, GA
The upkeep of something like that would be painstaking and costly. Having to figure out which of the 175 circuit boards had the malfunctioning blade of fiberoptic grass. I don't see that catching on...
Falsehoods are well-told, so think for yourself...
-
Phantanimal - Veteran
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:33 am
Phantanimal wrote:The upkeep of something like that would be painstaking and costly. Having to figure out which of the 175 circuit boards had the malfunctioning blade of fiberoptic grass. I don't see that catching on...
i agree completely....people are trampling on these fields, something is bound to break or get crushed somewhere
-
scooter - All-America
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:48 am
- Location: NIU
Too bad they don't have any videos or images of the turf. That would be great to see it in action.
I don't see any reason why it can't catch on. With the advertising possibilities, I doubt we'll have to wait too long to see it. How cool would that be as a player to actually see the first down marker in front of you instead of looking to the sidelines and just guessing? Say goodbye to the chang gain on that field.
I don't see any reason why it can't catch on. With the advertising possibilities, I doubt we'll have to wait too long to see it. How cool would that be as a player to actually see the first down marker in front of you instead of looking to the sidelines and just guessing? Say goodbye to the chang gain on that field.
"I assess the power of a will by how much resistance, pain, torture it endures and knows how to turn to its advantage." -Nietzsche
Droit au but!
Droit au but!
-
Dawson - Water Boy
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:05 pm
- Location: Duluth, MN
Call me a traditionalist, but I don't want to see anything like this at the following places:
-Lambeau Field
-Fenway Park
-Yankee Stadium
-Soldier Field
-99% of college football stadiums (1% being Boise St, anything's better than that blue)
I would be sick to my stomach if I ever saw a Geico or GoDaddy.com ad on the pitch of any of these fields
-Lambeau Field
-Fenway Park
-Yankee Stadium
-Soldier Field
-99% of college football stadiums (1% being Boise St, anything's better than that blue)
I would be sick to my stomach if I ever saw a Geico or GoDaddy.com ad on the pitch of any of these fields
EC Lacrosse Alum '06
-
Adam G - Ain't as good as I once was
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Living in a shotgun shack
Hope that does not apply to soccer pitches. Corporate logos on the field would be too distracting.
Brent
a LSA Fan.
a LSA Fan.
-
Brent Burns - Coca-Cola Collector
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:41 pm
- Location: in the Hewitt
Brent Burns wrote:Hope that does not apply to soccer pitches. Corporate logos on the field would be too distracting.
That's funny... I think it'd liven up a game of soccer!
EC Lacrosse Alum '06
-
Adam G - Ain't as good as I once was
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Living in a shotgun shack
Thinking more and more about this, I decided I really hope it doesn't work out. Don't get me wrong im all for the First down yellow line and such, but do you really want to see a miller light ad in the back field during play? Couldn't it be distracting to a reciever trying to land in bounds if he's on a doritos ad? I would assume that they would at least prohibit the ads during play, but they try to get ad revenue any way they can so who knows.
Chris Glover
Lindenwood University Lacrosse Alumni
Lindenwood University Lacrosse Alumni
-
yourmom - All-Conference
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:42 pm
- Location: St. Louis, MO
I don't think advertising would get that bad...I think the big piece is just having adjustable advertising. During halftime there can be ads all over the field and then maybe when a team is making a drive the opposite direction, the endzone will be an ad. I don't think they would allow the ads to be distracting to players, because that could definitely pose a problem.
"I assess the power of a will by how much resistance, pain, torture it endures and knows how to turn to its advantage." -Nietzsche
Droit au but!
Droit au but!
-
Dawson - Water Boy
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:05 pm
- Location: Duluth, MN
21 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests