by Ehethcoat on Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:45 pm
KU 22 Memphis 0
Memphis is a young team and they had 17 guys to start the game. After getting beat the previous night 16-2 by KSU, they didn't have a good weekend. We thank them for coming out to play us.
We talk about running up the score on teams all the time on this thread. No one ever comes up with solid reasons why they should or shouldn't. It's a personal issue for some, while others it's just business.
During this game - much as what Missouri did this weekend - we did hold up more than I wanted my team to. We only had 10 midfielders and 3 attackmen and our only goalie didn't play so I subbed in a 2nd line midfielder at goal. So with only 13 offensive players, 9 scored. If our starting line at midfield was on the field, it was typically on with a 3rd or even normally 4th line midfielder or 2. The 1st line didn't play much in the first quarter, played in the second, and then the entire offense was only allowed to go to cage after a successfully run offensive set or play. If I would have released my team to play how they wanted, it would have easily been 30 or 40 goals. Did we run up the score, no, we simply scored a lot. Could we have not scored so much sure, but what's the point in playing a game where we just have to set up in a circle and pass the ball around for 60 minutes effectively playing catch.
If teams have issues with getting run up like this or Missouri's score, then I would simply suggest for them to hold off scheduling teams that will put up scores like this until they can legitimately take them on, and at the same time, insure yourself of a decent travel squad, and improve your team so it doesn't happen in the future. Any team is capable of high scores, whether it is at Div. A or B so seen by Wheaton over Cornell, or some of Hardings scores last year.
Eric Hethcoat
Retired Head Coach
University of Kansas Men's Lacrosse