mavlax23 wrote:If UMLL teams did start playing GLLL teams in regulation, stop time games (which I don't think will happen, because there is really no need to pay for a full game of refs in a game that doesn't count at all), then whose rules would we go by? They are allowed to play ineligible players and have a completely made up set of rules (i.e. 6 poles on the field at once, no mouth pieces, no matching uniforms, etc.). So, I think if they had to abide by the UMLL rules (or the NCAA rules) then I don't think very many of the more dominant teams in that league would do as well, do to the fact that they play so many ineligible players and are used to a different set of rules.
I disagree. I think that competing against GLLL teams can be very beneficial to us UMLL teams in the GLLL's proximity. In May we will be playing a tournament at UW-La Crosse against the majority of the collegiate club teams in the state of Wisconsin. These teams all compete in the GLLL, and all play what they consider to be real games with real rules, meaning they use officials, and have jerseys at least as nice as what we at UW-Eau Claire played in last season.
Putting six poles on the field has been a rare tactic that UW-Madison used to employ. And If some of GLLL players choose not to wear mouthguards, than that is entirely their risk, but it certainly doesn't stop your team from being equipped.
As of this year, the Wisconsin teams in the GLLL don't rely on what the UMLL considers to be ineligible players. The UW-Madison A team was long comprised of graduate students, alumni, and some players with NCAA experience. The current Madison A and B teams are, by school rules, no longer allowed to field non-current UW students, and have subsequently lost the talent that made them so potent in the past. These ineligible players sometimes compete in summer tournaments, but they are by and large absent for spring play.
I have many ex-teammates on the other GLLL teams, like UW-Whitewater, Platteville, Milwaukee, and La Crosse, and while playing non-students isn't banned by their universities' bylaws, they simply do not have many players who aren't affiliated, full-time students. To say that they "play so many ineligble players" is incorrect.
Nevertheless, how can inexpensive, additional games be detrimental to UMLL teams? Especially when it's so difficult for UMLL clubs in their infancy to find extra competition that doesn't require any strenuous travel.