Page 1 of 1
SELC Standings update? Who is qualifying for Atlanta?
Posted:
Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:55 pmby Sonny
Standings update for Div. B - Which six team are going to qualify?
Also, Is Div. A set with the following six teams:
FSU, Georgia, Va Tech, Florida, Georgia Tech, and Clemson?
Div A
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:53 amby Ken Lovic
Division A
IN- UGA, GT, UF, FSU
Everyone else still has games this weekend. VT and Clemson have the inside track but there are key games to play this weekend. Also- the seedings will be decided this weekend. Both FSU/UF and UGA/GT are playing for division titles and potential first round byes.
laxpower has it difftent
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:58 amby gobblerlax05
Team PR selc W L T Pct. all gamesW L T Pct.
1 Florida State 78.03 9 0 0 1.00 13 3 0 0.81
2 Florida 75.32 5 1 0 0.83 8 2 0 0.80
3 Central Florida 71.01 4 1 0 0.80 7 3 0 0.70
4 Virginia Tech 74.91 6 2 0 0.75 8 2 0 0.80
5.Clemson 71.55 5 2 0 0.71 6 4 0 0.60
Re: laxpower has it difftent
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:39 amby Laxbum
gobblerlax05 wrote:Team PR selc W L T Pct. all gamesW L T Pct.
1 Florida State 78.03 9 0 0 1.00 13 3 0 0.81
2 Florida 75.32 5 1 0 0.83 8 2 0 0.80
3 Central Florida 71.01 4 1 0 0.80 7 3 0 0.70
4 Virginia Tech 74.91 6 2 0 0.75 8 2 0 0.80
5.Clemson 71.55 5 2 0 0.71 6 4 0 0.60
The seedings for the SELC are not determined by using laxpower. Therefore, it does not matter what laxpower is showing.
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:43 amby Danny Hogan
is the UF/FSU game this weekend for the #1 overall seed?
if UF wins, they would be the #1 with all teams having at least 1 inconf loss UF holding head to head tie-breaker, if FSU wins, FSU grabs the #1 (undefeated in conference), does that put UF at the #3?
What is VT's conference mandatory games record?
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:48 amby Beta
Im not 100% sure...
(If FSU beats UF) Doesn't that put UF @ #4 if the 1-3 spots are reserved for the division champs with 1-2 getting byes?
standings
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:15 amby Ken Lovic
If FSU wins they get #1 overall.
They are the only team that controls that seed outright.
Then it gets congested. UGA beat VT, lost to UF. UF beat UGA, lost to VT. and so on.
VT is 3-0 but has 2 divisional games this weekend. If they lose them both it gets tricky. If Clemson beats USC they secure a bid with a VT vistory as well.
hope this helps a bit.
Key to remember- Division winners can only be seeded 1-3 and 2nd place division winners can only be seeded 4-6.
Re: standings
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:54 pmby Hugh Nunn
Ken Lovic wrote:If FSU wins they get #1 overall.
They are the only team that controls that seed outright.
Then it gets congested. UGA beat VT, lost to UF. UF beat UGA, lost to VT. and so on.
VT is 3-0 but has 2 divisional games this weekend. If they lose them both it gets tricky. If Clemson beats USC they secure a bid with a VT vistory as well.
hope this helps a bit.
Clear as Mud.
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:22 pmby Sonny
From Mike Cummings
North Region (NR):
Elon- - (3-1 vs. NR teams), NR games remaining: Appalachian State (Saturday, April 14)
Furman- - (2-1 vs. NR teams), NR games remaining: UNC-Charlotte (Wednesday, April 11), Davidson (Sunday, April 15)
UNC-Charlotte- - (3-0 vs. NR teams), NR games remaining: Furman (Wednesday, April 11), SVU (Thursday, April 12)
Davidson- - (2-2 vs. NR teams), NR games remaining: Furman (Sunday, April 15)
South Region (SR):
Emory- - (5-0 vs. SR teams)
SCAD- - (4-1 vs. SR teams)
Eckerd- - (3-2 vs. SR teams)
NOTE: The North Region is not arranged in any particular order, whereas the South Region lists the Top 3 teams.
Posted:
Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:41 pmby packlax
Just curious, what are the tie breaking procedures for teams with tied divisional records. Looking at the games left to play, there is chance, albeit a slim one, that 5 teams in the North division will finish 3-2. Anyone have any info?
Posted:
Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:48 pmby Sonny
Posted:
Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:04 amby GeorgiaLacrosse
Sonny wrote:
I like the logo
I wish we could change the conference logo too
Posted:
Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:09 amby Sonny
You don't like this?
conference logo is great
Posted:
Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:26 pmby FLALAX
The conference logo is great. Do not change it!