Page 1 of 2

Theoretical Discussion on LSA North/South Alignment

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:55 pm
by murphlaxtx
Now before anyone rips me for starting a topic like this, it is for discussion purposes only right now. Yes, I know we just started this season. Yes, I know a lot can happen between now and the conference meetings. However, it has been brought up to me a few times recently. IF the teams stay the same as they are right now heading into the Fall of 2007, do we look into a possible realignment for next year? Again, I know there will be a lot of factors to look at, such as any team moving up from the B division or any new teams being accepted. With 7 in the North and 5 in the South, it has to beg the question......will a realignment be needed and how will it work?

Too early

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:30 pm
by Karl Lynch
Too many contingency to consider right now.

IF you want to play the IF game, UT to the South. Conversation completed.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:44 pm
by benji
I think Karl is correct. Moving Texas to the South would be the only feasible option. Given the results of the past few years of LSA competition, this would have huge implications and could potentially have a dramatic effect on the LSA playoff scenario.

Hypothetically, we could split into three divisions, the north, central, and south, should another team rejoin or move to A in the south
North: Tech, SMU, OU, UNT, OSU
Central: Texas, Baylor, Texas State, TAMU
South: LSU, Rice, Tulane, Other Team

TAMU or TxState and other team could be maneuvered accordingly, depending on the location of the 'Other Team'.

Of course, this is all hypothetical. I'm not sure even how the playoff scenario would work. Maybe the top teams is each division and a wild-card, which would play the team with the worst conference record out of the three division leaders?

I dunno.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:53 pm
by murphlaxtx
Thats a very interesting scenario. This topic is all in good fun anyway, just to pass time between games. I just like to see what ideas people have. There is plenty of time for things to change.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:41 pm
by OklahomaLax45
I like the three conference look...that'd make things interesting. How would play-off work under that at the end of the year, maybe a round robin or just go straight seeds from each division? But probably the most viable for next fall would be UT going south like karl said

any word on Houston for next year?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:16 pm
by benji
OklahomaLax45 wrote:
any word on Houston for next year?


That was the assumption I was making for 'Other team' ... Haven't heard anything yet though.

The IF game

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:19 pm
by Karl Lynch
I am hesitant to realign too deeply with the inevitable departure of three of our division D teams to Division III.

The real work will begin when those teams go.

Re: The IF game

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:24 pm
by Beta
Karl Lynch wrote:I am hesitant to realign too deeply with the inevitable departure of three of our division D teams to Division III.

The real work will begin when those teams go.


Which teams are going D III?

Re: The IF game

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:33 pm
by OklahomaLax45
Beta wrote:Which teams are going D III?


i think it's Southwestern and St. Eds...but who's the third? Trinity?

That and i know that Southwestern Oklahoma State is organizing, there'd be another Div B Team

PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:05 pm
by shrekjr
Hendrix (Arkansas), Trinity, Southwestern, and Austin College are all part of the D-III SCAC. According to a recent discussion with the SCAC Assistant Commisioner, he acknowledged that lacrosse would most likely be the next sport to enter varsity play in the conference. However, he also stated there is no time frame to do that and there is nothing currently on the table.

Given that, Hendrix has hired a coach to prepare for varsity play in the spring of 2008. I guess that means they will be joining a different conference for lacrosse until the SCAC has its own conference.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:00 am
by bawigga
What was that team that attempted to join the LSA I think 2 seasons ago then bailed because of lack of interest (from Louisiana?)? Have we heard from them at all?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:08 am
by Campbell
bawigga wrote:What was that team that attempted to join the LSA I think 2 seasons ago then bailed because of lack of interest (from Louisiana?)? Have we heard from them at all?


Loyola-NO?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:28 am
by Brent Burns
Campbell wrote:
bawigga wrote:What was that team that attempted to join the LSA I think 2 seasons ago then bailed because of lack of interest (from Louisiana?)? Have we heard from them at all?


Loyola-NO?


Yes. Another team from Louisiana was Nicholls State (LSA Div. B).

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:14 am
by Tarzan
Loyola NO is still around...They play against NOLC often and bring numbers depending on how the sun is shining.

Nicholls is another story.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:24 pm
by bawigga
Maybe it was Loyola-NO, I can't remember...