Page 1 of 2
Whittier v. UCSB
Posted:
Tue Feb 15, 2005 10:59 pm
by Bluevelvet
Will Whittier cancel the game due to wet fields? It looks like Friday will be the only really rainy day.
http://www.weather.com/activities/other/other/weather/tenday.html?locid=USCA1239
Posted:
Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:58 pm
by the lax
Perhaps if they fear an upset?
Posted:
Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:31 am
by CATLAX MAN
This could be a problem all over the WCLL this week as the games that are slated for Northern California will possibly be affected by muddy fields and/or unavailable fields.
Posted:
Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:57 am
by TrojanLaxman5
Our head coach, Nate Watkins, was Whittier's Defensive Coordinator last year and he told us that despite their varsity status, they were always kicked off the field if there was rain. Looks pretty likely if the weather hits...
Posted:
Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:14 am
by Bluevelvet
Bummer. I just made a plane reservation for Saturday. My first flight to John Wayne airport.
Posted:
Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:40 am
by TrojanLaxman5
If it's not rained out, here's my opinion/prediction for the game:
I think the UCSB vs. Whittier game will definitely be in favor of SB. Whittier beat us in a scrimmage by 3 or 4 without 3 of our starters in. Granted, it was a practice-type situation, but my teammates agreed that they are very good, they don't make a lot of mistakes, they pressure well on D, but they didn't look as amazing as we thought they would. From what I've read about SB, and based on their performance so far, I expect SB to win by about 3-4 goals, if not more. This may be a bold guess, but there it it, I said it.
Posted:
Fri Feb 18, 2005 3:27 pm
by Wade
Anyone planning on driving/carpooling up to the game from SD? I'm debating depending on the weather.
Posted:
Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:27 pm
by the lax
Probably have to take into account SB's body count. 2:1 over Whittier. Although if the weather isn't great, perhaps Whittier's middies will stay fresh.
UCSB vs Whittier
Posted:
Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:01 pm
by Bigdaddy11
Prediction:
Gauchos 14
Poets 8
Posted:
Fri Feb 18, 2005 7:50 pm
by Bluevelvet
the lax wrote:Probably have to take into account SB's body count. 2:1 over Whittier. Although if the weather isn't great, perhaps Whittier's middies will stay fresh.
Won't a sloppy field make them more tired?
Posted:
Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:08 pm
by onpoint
For the first (and maybe only) time in history, I will agree with the lax on this one. A muddy field is easier to play in and I think you end up less tired. Mostly because it's not so hard on your knees and legs. I don't know physically why exactly, but I've always found that to be true. That being said, I don't think conditioning will be a problem for Whittier as from second hand knowledge, their running schedule is pretty severe.
Posted:
Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:09 pm
by Danny Hogan
i'de have to disagree. on a muddy field, everything you wear ends up weighing more and each step is sticky and takes a little more effort to move around.
Posted:
Sat Feb 19, 2005 3:54 am
by sohotrightnow
onpoint aren't you a goalie? what would you know about running?
Posted:
Sat Feb 19, 2005 9:58 am
by onpoint
Hey, I've been called an "athletic" goalie before!! I can tell you a lot about running. Every time I warm up, I get a good look at the other poor schlubs running their laps, so I would say I am pretty qualified to make such a statement!
Posted:
Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:50 am
by Ravaging Beast
Game is canceled.