ZagGrad wrote:How and why were BYU chosen? Had Oregon or CSU won the championship, would they have gone?
The invitation to play came before BYU won the championship, and has nothing to do with BYU winning the MCLA national championship (seeing as how they had not won since 2000). The invitation was not developed by the MCLA.
The actual how's and why's would take a long time to go into. It all goes back to the fact that Coach Lamb has spent the last 11 years being a great ambassador not only for BYU lacrosse but for the USLIA/MDIA/MCLA. This opportunity is just the latest in a long line of great opportunities Coach Lamb has been able to garner for those who have been fortunate enough to play for him. There have also been a few other key individuals who have given a great deal of time and effort (and in some cases $) so that the BYU lax team could play in events like this one.
I think JP's post was right on. Of course I would love to see BYU do well at the tournament. And in spite of EvanFSU's comments BYU has done well when ever they have gone back east (also playing 40-50 guys). That being said I believe BYU (and the MCLA) has "won" just by being at the tournament. Everyone who has a chance to watch BYU on Oct. 20th will walk away impressed with their level of play, organization, and commitment to the game. By association teams like CSU, SB, CU, Michigan, Oregon, etc., who go toe to toe with BYU every year also get to show their quality of play.
I am, of course, a BYU homer, but I would think all of the MCLA would be cheering (some in secret) for BYU to show well at St. Paul's. I will be making the drive up from Charlottesville and camping out for good seats the week prior, anyone can join me for some BBQ and rootbeer