John Paul wrote:Towbey,
We don't enter stats here because they are not accurately kept here. Varsity games are not included (even if they are real games, like yours and ours versus St. Vincent), and game participation is not taken into account. If this site goes to the system the CCLA site used last year, that tracked all games and included game participation in the formula, we'll go back to entering them here. In the meantime, our own website has all the statistics anyone could ever want.
(I don't mean any of this as a criticism of Sonny and Matt, who've done an amazing job getting this site up and going so well after the catastrophe in the fall. I'm just waiting until it's improved and accurate to make full use of it.)
JP
On a side note, the CCLA did not use a participation system last year. I believe that was 2 years ago. Stats here are kept accurately, there is just a difference in opinion about how to interpret the information.
It seems that at leats a few people want this. I think that it's a wonderful idea for teams like yours and mine that have the ability, and the means to track the participation of every player through out every game. However, many B and newer A teams don't have 3-5 managers/stat persons to take care of this, so I think that it's something that people really should consider. This site is about the USL MDIA as a whole so we have to keep the little guys in mind.
Also, If someone is showing up in 1 or 2 games, and they put in 5 goals in each, they are not going to show up on the stats page any ways because there is (and will remain) a 3 game minimum. It's not fair to someone that is busting their butt every game, putting in consistantly 2 goals, and 2 assists to be listed lower than someone who gets in for the second half of a blow out, and puts in 4 goals and an assist.
It's also not fair to just use striclty "goals" or "assists" without a per game system because northern teams have... how do I say this... "April Heavy" schedules, where as southern teams can get in a lot more games in Jan/Feb.
As far as doing a per game participation system.
1. I am not opposed to it.
2. I'd like to see what MANY other coaches feel about it.
3. it's too late to do it this year, and it wouldn't be difficult at all to get it going for next year.
I want to make sure that every usl mdia team feels comfortable with the site. We already get over a million hits a month, and I'm really proud that what sonny, and the rest of us have come up with is something that you all are that interested in.
Wow... that turned into a lot longer post than I thought it would.
Good luck tonight with Oakland, JP.
Matt
p.s. Basically what we are talking about would be a little check box next to each players name in the scores entry page that says "they played" or "they did not play".