Comparing "Virtual Varsity" to real varsity.

An open forum for all MCLA fans! Be sure your topic is not already covered by one of the other forums or it will be moved.

Postby lil lady lax fan on Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:56 am

BearcatLax wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't U. San Diego (B Div and champion) play UC- San Diego (A Div national playoff team) and only lose by 3? That is a rare case and I think USD is far and away better than it's B counterparts, but it happened.


You forgot to mention that San Diego also played San Diego State, and won. True, SDSU wasn't a playoff team, but they're still Div. A.

Claremont, who is also Division B in the WCLL, beat a couple of their Div. A opponents. They also had some close losses to a couple other A teams.

Both teams have some pretty good players and coaches. I think that makes a big difference. That and attitude.
Cathi Piccione
Rockhound and LAX aficionado
User avatar
lil lady lax fan
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: East of LA


Postby mholtz on Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:06 am

Zeuslax wrote:No doubt in my opinion that the discrepancy from A to B is huge in the CCLA. Saw a lot of games with teams that finished near the bottom of the A division. To say that MSU is near the bottom of the CCLA-A would be a little exagerated. I think across the league (both A & B), teams play up and down to the level of competition.

Not sure about scheduling of A vs. B games?


I hope I didn't imply that I thought we were at the bottom of A in the CCLA. We finished 4th out of 12 teams and were semi finalists where we lost to eventual champion UofM.

We were top 1/3rd of the league last year, and hope to carry on that tradition this year.
Matt Holtz
Head Coach, University of Detroit-Mercy
CollegeLAX.us developer/admin.
User avatar
mholtz
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:12 am
Location: East Lansing, MI

Postby Zeuslax on Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:20 pm

The B side has a long way to go. Not as far as some may perceive. From what I'm seeing a few of the B schools are only a couple of players away from competing. Competition is different than winning, but its happening. The x factor for them is the behind the scenes. The B programs will need a level of commitment from people other than players, and a solitary coach (sometimes 2 coaches). To create an environment equal with A teams a reality.

Hopefully when B teams start to defeat some of the A's. It isn't because the Div-A program had injuries, a bad day, players sick, team flu, or that the A team decided to play some of their "B" players. Just kidding!!!

I pose this question. Would it be a negative thing if there wasn't a need for a A or B division which is largely based on skill and logistics? All things being equal of course.
To get back on topic. Haven't some MDIA teams beaten varsity programs?
Anthony
Zeuslax
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 1144
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 2:36 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Postby byualum on Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:22 pm

BYU has beaten Whittier, CSU has beaten Colorado College in each of the past two seasons...
BYU '96
Texas A&M '02
User avatar
byualum
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:23 pm
Location: Parker, CO

Postby CATLAX MAN on Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:03 pm

Both UCSB & Sonoma have beaten NDNU the last 2 seasons. UCSB also beat MIT in 2004.
User avatar
CATLAX MAN
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Postby LaxRef on Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:06 pm

CATLAX MAN wrote:Both UCSB & Sonoma have beaten NDNU the last 2 seasons. UCSB also beat MIT in 2004.


Yeah, but they cheated. They put a bunch of integral equations and Riemannian geometry problems on their jerseys, and the MIT players were so distracted they couldn't catch, pass, or scoop. :D
-LaxRef
User avatar
LaxRef
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:18 am

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


cron