it's unbelievable !!!
Michigan men's lacrosse team has never beat BYU in Provo,
Utah before.
I root for Michigan. Oh yeah
huge congrats to Wolverines
jeff
lacrosse fan
Michigan 12, BYU 9 FINAL (Sat, 3/1/08)
35 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
it was a terrible, sloppy game. both teams' defenses looked awful and the offenses just stood around and watched one guy dodge. michigan KILLED byu on face-offs.
-
ineedmorecowbell - Veteran
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:56 pm
- Location: utah
ineedmorecowbell wrote:it was a terrible, sloppy game. both teams' defenses looked awful and the offenses just stood around and watched one guy dodge. michigan KILLED byu on face-offs.
no offense but michigan has always been boring to watch IMO. They love the settled sets and don't really push it. Doesn't sound like a lot has changed
Brauck Cullen
University of Oregon 2002-2006
Napa Youth Coach 2006
-----------------------------------------------------------
Don't ever take sides with someone outside the family...
University of Oregon 2002-2006
Napa Youth Coach 2006
-----------------------------------------------------------
Don't ever take sides with someone outside the family...
-
Timbalaned - All-America
- Posts: 1177
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:54 pm
- Location: OREGON
their not terrible but their not great either-instead of complaining about Michigan jumping on faceoffs time and again, they should've harped on the fact that Hier killed any chance for a comeback with some bad penalties down the stretch.
I really though BYU had a chance to come back until the first Hier penalty-anyone see what he did?
I really though BYU had a chance to come back until the first Hier penalty-anyone see what he did?
-
PigPen - Da Bomb Diggity
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: La Hacienda
Just watched the delayed TV broadcast (I thought they did a very nice job overall) -- MANY kudos to Michigan for a great, well-executed game, and a well-earned victory. BYU does have a few things to work on if they want to earn back that #1 spot, there are a lot of very good teams out there lately.
I have one sort of off-the-wall technical question, though, not so much related to the game but to the broadcast itself. It seems to me that somewhere along the line, much too little video bandwidth was allocated, and as a result the images appearing at my end were quite low resolution and low detail, with lots of mpeg blocking (especially when things moved) and other artifacts indicative of simply not having enough data in the pipe, particularly not enough to follow a rapidly moving sporting event, but even on stationary scenes, much of the detail was lost too. This was particularly evident for the first part of the game, somewhere along the way somebody must have kicked it up a notch or two so that later in the game it was better, but still not really what it should be. I'd be interested to know what other viewers in other areas of the country saw; I don't know if the restriction/limitation was on the BYU end, or farther down the chain, perhaps even my local cable company. Perhaps this was related to the last minute switch to the turf field? Anyway, just a hint for next time...
I have one sort of off-the-wall technical question, though, not so much related to the game but to the broadcast itself. It seems to me that somewhere along the line, much too little video bandwidth was allocated, and as a result the images appearing at my end were quite low resolution and low detail, with lots of mpeg blocking (especially when things moved) and other artifacts indicative of simply not having enough data in the pipe, particularly not enough to follow a rapidly moving sporting event, but even on stationary scenes, much of the detail was lost too. This was particularly evident for the first part of the game, somewhere along the way somebody must have kicked it up a notch or two so that later in the game it was better, but still not really what it should be. I'd be interested to know what other viewers in other areas of the country saw; I don't know if the restriction/limitation was on the BYU end, or farther down the chain, perhaps even my local cable company. Perhaps this was related to the last minute switch to the turf field? Anyway, just a hint for next time...
- laxdad03
- All-Conference
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:16 pm
No offense but I can't believe anyone would be critical about BYU's broadcast or technology. The rest of the teams through out the MCLA would give anything to have their games on TV. Not even the mighty multi-million dollar endowment Michigan get their games broadcast nationally. Many of the top teams are struggling to find practice fields.
SLN
-
OldRamAlum83 - Rookie
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:41 pm
- Location: TX
i watched the game and thought the announcers were great. Camera man could use a bit of practice but for a MCLA game being broadcast i thought it was awesome to see. It was rough watching NCAA D1 all day then switching to this game but I loved watching it.
-
Gvlax - All-America
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:44 am
- Location: Grand Rapids, MI
OldRamAlum83 wrote:No offense but I can't believe anyone would be critical about BYU's broadcast or technology. The rest of the teams through out the MCLA would give anything to have their games on TV. Not even the mighty multi-million dollar endowment Michigan get their games broadcast nationally. Many of the top teams are struggling to find practice fields.
Touche. I really didn't mean to be critical or complaining at all, just trying to debug and help make things better if possible (I suffer from being hypersensitive in that area, I suppose, I design video processing hardware for a living...). Sorry about that, but I really did just want to see where the overcompression was happening.
- laxdad03
- All-Conference
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:16 pm
35 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to Live Action Game Reports
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests