New area

Rules & latest updates are here. Post any suggestions you have.

New area

Postby TexOle on Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:28 am

I would like to see a special area where officials could discuss game situations and rule interpretations without people reading them. There are a ton of times where I see something in a game and it would be nice to discuss not only with the other officials in my area, but also in other areas. I also think that this would help to make the games called more consistently in all parts of the country. Just a thought.
Tex
TexOle
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 583
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Northfield, MN


Postby shrekjr on Fri Feb 18, 2005 12:46 pm

What do you think, Sonny? Set up an officials forum here, or refer them to the other website?
User avatar
shrekjr
Old ugly deaf blind ref
Old ugly deaf blind ref
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Texas

Postby tamu33 on Tue Feb 22, 2005 8:40 am

I agree with this too. I have consistent problems with older officials here in Texas that do not call games the same way as other officials do around the country. This year we are implementing a new evaluating system so maybe that will help out.
<b>Ali Sarvarian
Team Viva # 33</b>
User avatar
tamu33
All-Conference
All-Conference
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:26 am

Postby tlaing1 on Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:20 pm

I personally like the idea BUT I think there should also be a section where you can get straight answers about rule interpretations. If people can ask why somethjing was called a certain way it might be easier to understand how to not get it next time.
Thomas Laing
User avatar
tlaing1
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Manasquan, New Jersey

Postby shrekjr on Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:45 pm

tlaing1 wrote:I personally like the idea BUT I think there should also be a section where you can get straight answers about rule interpretations. If people can ask why somethjing was called a certain way it might be easier to understand how to not get it next time.

The difficult part about answering interpretations is that you cannot get a common answer to a judgement call. For example, I was asked once to "define" an illegal body check. There are so many things it could be. Kind of like unnecesarry roughness....there is a line where it either is or isn't unnecessary, but defining that line isn't easy. It is done on a case by case basis that is judgement by the official at that time. If you're asking about rules that are specified and defined in the book, those are easy. But you'll probably never be satisfied with comments regarding a judgement call you didn't like the first time.
User avatar
shrekjr
Old ugly deaf blind ref
Old ugly deaf blind ref
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Texas

Postby Sonny on Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:03 pm

I've asked the MDIA National Assigning Authority Bob Duggan if he wants to moderate a new forum where coaches/players/fans can ask referee questions and/or rules interpretations.

If/when he responds, we may try to do this in the future.
Webmaster
Image
Image
User avatar
Sonny
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8183
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby laxfan25 on Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:42 pm

Ditto me as thinking it's a good idea. I'd be willing to moderate it if you don't get any response from Mr. Duggan. 36 years in the game, 20 as a ref, trained clinician and I have connections to several rules interpreters if additonal help is needed...
User avatar
laxfan25
Scoop, Cradle, & Rock!
Scoop, Cradle, & Rock!
 
Posts: 1952
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:06 pm


Return to Message Board Guidelines/Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


cron