Page 1 of 2

Who is your top 5?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:28 pm
by Woda
Mine is:
1. CSU
2. UMD
3. Chapman
4. BYU
5. UCSB

Re: Who is your top 5?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:17 pm
by Jac Coyne
Woda wrote:1. CSU
2. UMD


Is that a de facto prediction for Sunday?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:26 pm
by horn17
1. Dwayne Wade
2. Charles Barkley
3. My Mom
4. My Better Half
5. Rob Graff


....oh wait you asked for my top 5, not who's in my 5.....

Sorry, with those commericals...I just couldn't resist

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:33 pm
by Frank Clark
For that you are my 1 through 5. Why? Because you typed it, read it and still hit submit.

Ouch

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:22 am
by the lax
1. Duluth
2. Chapman
3. UCSB
4. Oregon
5. Michigan

BYU lost 2 games. You'd can't be 2-2 and be number 1 at anything. Club teams can't have breaking news releases every team they beat a D3 team but then ask people to over look their losses. BYU and CSU lost. You can't lose games and not be punished.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:02 am
by Gross
the lax, I completely disagree with your analysis on dropping BYU and CSU out of the top 5. I don't think that each of them losing close games to NCAA D3 teams can be a factor in where they rank in the MCLA. The MCLA rankings represent where a given team stands relative to the other MCLA teams in their division. How they fare against a non-MCLA opponent should not be somehow interpreted as to how they will fare against an MCLA team, with a possible exception being if Team A and Team B both played a common non-MCLA opponent. But even then, I think it would be dangerous to consider those results. Someone from BYU, CSU, Michigan, or any other team that plays NCAA opponents annually can correct me if I am wrong on this, but, aside from pride and bragging rights, the game has no significance to either team (i.e. record, ranking, etc.) and you don't know if either coach involved in a game like that is treating it as they would a MCLA or NCAA opponent, or as an opportunity to work on specific things, get players game time, etc. Personally, I think that scheduling games against NCAA competition is great for the MCLA, and I would worry that encouraging these games to count towards MCLA standing would discourage teams from scheduling them. While I have no personal experience playing or coaching in an MCLA-NCAA game, that's just my take on them. I would like to hear from anyone who has played or coached in such a game though...feel free to tell me if I am completely off base on this.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:16 am
by CATLAX MAN
the lax wrote: You can't lose games and not be punished.


Not that I agree with this statement (or anything that "the lax" says) , but if that is true, then why is UCSB at #3 after losing to BYU? Another example of "the Lax" and his convoluted logic.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:05 am
by NYBuilt
1. UMD
2. CSU
3. Chapman
4. BYU
5. UCSB

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:47 am
by Ravaging Beast
People keep coming on this board and put UMD at #1 with no explanation. Is this based on their poor showing at Nationals last season? Because I have not seen anything warranting a top 5 ranking other than Zamboni's analysis early in the pre-season.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:50 am
by Ravaging Beast
I guess I will put my top 5.

1. Chapman (tested by a good team and showed results)
2. BYU (tested by a good team and lost by 1. Beat two good teams UCSB and SFU)
3. CSU (Not tested yet, but always has a very good team)
4. UMD (If they do turn out to be good, I don't want to look stupid. We will know this weekend)
5. UCSB (Tested and lost to BYU, but easily beat Col Poly and Arizona)

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:50 am
by Jolly Roger
We'll know a lot more about UMD after this weekend.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:56 am
by Hi-Line Lax
not a lot of love for Oregon either... they are 3-0 this year and have outscored opponents 63-8. I know these weren't the toughest teams on their schedules, but it seems like a lot of people are still looking to last year... well the Ducks don't appear to have "fallen off" so I'm curious as to why they are no longer mentioned much in the Top 5.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:36 pm
by WCLLPREZ
I'll share my top 6 from my first poll

1. CSU- lost close game to Div 3-CC
2. UCSB- 6-1, only loss to # 1 at the time
3. UMD- not really tested at this time
4. BYU- due to Chap loss
5. Chap- couldn't sned them all the way to # 1 based on 1 quality win
6. Oreg- although 3-0 by wide margins, untested to date.

I am sure things will start to shake out with expanded play bot in conference and oout of conference the next few weeks.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:07 pm
by CATLAX MAN
You've got UCSB ranked above BYU, who they lost to and Chapman ranked below BYU, who they beat. That really doesn't make sense. It's true that it's early and it will all shake out, but right now you have to give relevance to recent results.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:25 pm
by TrainerDan
1. Chapman: undefeated and beat the #1 ranked team
2. BYU: Was #1 and lost by 1 goal. Has a quality road win at UCSB and a home win over SFU
3. CSU: Hasn't played an MCLA team yet but took DIII Colorado College to OT.
4. UMD: Look good for now
5. UCSB: 1 loss vs. #1 and 6 good wins.

Oregon is right on the cusp along with Michigan.