Lindenwood University sure to make the poll

Discuss the latest MCLA or NCAA Polls here.

Postby Kyle Berggren on Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:57 pm

and you can't blame any team for not wanting to schedule somebody... Next year, assuming they keep winning, will be much easier for them to get the games they want. A team like CSU shouldn't schedule Puget Sound if they don't want to.
PNCLL Treasurer
User avatar
Kyle Berggren
All-America
All-America
 
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA


Postby Chris Larson on Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:13 am

In addition, a lot of the upper echelon teams have reciprocal playing agreements that extend a few years out making it difficult to add (particularly away) games without a full clendar year's notice.
Chris Larson

District 7 Lacrosse Official
SFO - Upper Midwest Lacrosse Conference
Treasurer - Upper Midwest Lacrosse Officials Association
General Manager - Team MN Lacrosse
Boy's Coaching Coordinator - St Paul Youth Lacrosse
User avatar
Chris Larson
Premium
Premium
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: St Paul, MN

Postby LaxGuru on Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:45 pm

The best route with the current system in place, I believe as someone else stated, is to eliminate a pre-season poll (or create one,don't release it but give it to selected pollsters to use as a guidline) for 1.) a team that gets a high ranking but can't play up to it won't be difficult to drop in further polls 2.) pollsters can look at say the first 2-3 weeks of action then vote and release that as the leagues first poll. That would eliminate teams that are supposed to be good that are not up to standard (key personnel losses, injuries, unforseen bad play etc.) & also give teams starting strong that don't usually get notice the credit they deserve. Just a suggestion.
LaxGuru
Veteran
Veteran
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:09 pm

Previous

Return to Polls

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


cron