Page 1 of 1

I <3 the Colts

PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:33 pm
by sohotrightnow
That is all. I don't have to listen to any Boston fans until April. Hooray!

Re: I <3 the Colts

PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:59 pm
by bste_lax
sohotrightnow wrote:That is all. I don't have to listen to any Boston fans until April. Hooray!


Get ready to hear the Super Bowl Shuffle about 235234234 times in the next 2 weeks.

After living with a Chicagoan in college and going to school with many, when winning, Bears fans are some of the most annoying I have ever found. And "when winning" is the key phrase in that last sentence.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:10 am
by GrayBear
This is a statement that can apply to anybody who takes their sports fandom too seriously. It includes Packers, Vikings, Pats, Cowboys (and some I'm forgetting) fans I have known, and isn't limited to pro sports (see, Notre Dame and, dare I say it, even Iowa and Illinois on occasion). Those who bask in the reflected fame of others' achievements to that extreme extent are indeed annoying, but it has little to do with what particular team you favor.

As for me, I was a Bears fan in the beginning, and I'm old enough to savor this a little bit--after all, I remember the Jim Dooley, Abe Gibron, Neill Armstrong and Jack Pardee days as well as the Ditka/Lovie Smith successes.

(If those names I just put out sound obscure, there's a good reason for that!) :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:40 am
by Brent Burns
GrayBear wrote:As for me, I was a Bears fan in the beginning, and I'm old enough to savor this a little bit--after all, I remember the Jim Dooley, Abe Gibron, Neill Armstrong and Jack Pardee days as well as the Ditka/Lovie Smith successes.


I believe Jack Pardee is still probably the only guy from a 6-man football team in Texas to ever play in the NFL. He was one of the Junction Boys under Bear Bryant at A&M. I still can vividly recall the picture of Jack Pardee in my dad's Aggieland yearbook.

Anyway, I'm a Patriots fan, and I salute and congratulate the Ponies, I mean, the Colts for winning the game and propelling the Indianapolis Colts as well as the City of Indianapolis into the Super Bowl. I just hope that the media does not make a big deal out of Dungy and Lovie as being the first African-American coaches to lead their teams to the Super Bowl.
However, we know that the media will do that anyway...

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:11 am
by StrykerFSU
Good job by Manning, I didn't think he had it in him. He finally exposed the Patriots' secondary and how much they missed Rodney Harrison. The Pats D looked like a fraternity flag football team on a couple of those second half drives.

It also didn't hurt that apparently pass interference in the end zone only goes one way. Pat's guy face guards Colts' receiver making no contact with him at all and the ball bounces off the back of his shoulder...pass interference. Colts' DB face guards Pat's receiver and tackles him in the end zone and the ball falls incomplete...no pass intereference. :?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:40 am
by Danny Hogan
yeah i didn't think face-guarding mattered so long as there was no contact.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:27 am
by CATLAX MAN
StrykerFSU wrote:It also didn't hurt that apparently pass interference in the end zone only goes one way. Pat's guy face guards Colts' receiver making no contact with him at all and the ball bounces off the back of his shoulder...pass interference. Colts' DB face guards Pat's receiver and tackles him in the end zone and the ball falls incomplete...no pass intereference. :?


The difference is that the Pat's guy made contact with the ball during face guarding which is a penalty. The Colts guy did not make contact with the ball......no penalty. The refs got it right.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:41 am
by laxfan25
GrayBear wrote:This is a statement that can apply to anybody who takes their sports fandom too seriously. It includes Packers, Vikings, Pats, Cowboys (and some I'm forgetting) fans I have known, and isn't limited to pro sports (see, Notre Dame and, dare I say it, even Iowa and Illinois on occasion). Those who bask in the reflected fame of others' achievements to that extreme extent are indeed annoying, but it has little to do with what particular team you favor.


Living in the land of the Lions for the last 30 years - you don't have those worries here! :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:13 pm
by Beta
Danny Hogan wrote:yeah i didn't think face-guarding mattered so long as there was no contact.


You can't completely face-guard the receiver. You have to "attempt to play the ball" more/less. Very discretionary call.

Re: I <3 the Colts

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:50 pm
by Jay Wisnieski
bste_lax wrote:...Bears fans are some of the most annoying I have ever found. And "when winning" is the key phrase in that last sentence.


At least Bears fans are only annoying when they're winning...Cubs fans are annoying no matter what the Cubs' record is.

Re: I <3 the Colts

PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:31 pm
by bste_lax
Jay Wisnieski wrote:
bste_lax wrote:...Bears fans are some of the most annoying I have ever found. And "when winning" is the key phrase in that last sentence.


At least Bears fans are only annoying when they're winning...Cubs fans are annoying no matter what the Cubs' record is.


I will agree with that statement and I am a Cubs fan. Go to Wrigley this year and ask someone if they know who Ryan Theriot is and I am guessing they will say no then ask you where the beer line is.