Page 1 of 2
Ahmadinejad wants debate with Bush, hires Al Gore as coach

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:15 pm
by StrykerFSU

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:32 pm
by sohotrightnow
Bush shouldn't misunderestimate Ahmadinejad

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:51 pm
by Sonny
Ahmadinejad shouldn't underestimate Bush.

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:57 pm
by sohotrightnow
I thought it was misunderestimate?

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:12 pm
by Zeuslax
If only we lived in a mythical land where you fight with words...........

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:18 pm
by Adam Gamradt
He's just experiencing moral and intellectual confusion, the same as the Democrats, or anyone else who dares question this administration.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/29/ ... index.html
Too bad Bush's handlers won't let him dish out some Texas Justice.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_Texas_Ranger
I'm sure George would do at least as well as he did against Kerry and Gore.

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:41 pm
by Sonny
Adam - I'm curious as to what part of that Rumsfeld article that you disagreed with (and why).

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:53 pm
by Adam Gamradt
Sonny,
You're trolling, but I'll bite.
If you insist on calling me a coward, merely because I disagree with your actions, then you are going to piss me off.
This administration has clearly stated they view anyone who disagrees with their decisions is a traitor and a coward.
Dissent does not aid the enemy, to argue otherwise for policital gain, is shameful.

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:04 pm
by StrykerFSU
It's all part of Ahmadinejad's grand strategery.

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:09 pm
by Sonny
No trolling. You were the one that enter sarcasm into the equation.
I'm curious as to what you disagreed with Rummy specifically from that article.

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:13 pm
by Adam Gamradt
I disagree with the way the war\wars have been handled.
I do not suffer from moral nor intellectual confusion.
I've also answered your question, twice.

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:16 pm
by DanGenck
A real debate would be like high school debate classes... a lot of shouting and posturing.
However... I would really like to read letters/essays back and forth between the two. It would be interesting to read how they both respond to each other when they have time to think and thoughtfully support their arguments.
What can I say? I'm a dreamer...

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:36 pm
by Jolly Roger
DanGenck wrote: I would really like to read letters/essays back and forth between the two. It would be interesting to read how they both respond to each other when they have time to think and thoughtfully support their arguments.
I assume when you refer to
they re:GWB thinking you're using the "royal" they


Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:49 pm
by Sonny
Addressing several thousand veterans at the American Legion's national convention, Rumsfeld recited what he called the lessons of history, including the failed efforts to appease the Adolf Hitler regime in the 1930s.
"I recount this history because once again we face the same kind of challenges in efforts to confront the rising threat of a new type of fascism" he said.
check
"But it is apparent that many have still not learned history's lessons," he said, adding that part of the problem is that the American news media have tended to emphasize the negative rather than the positive.
He said, for example, that more media attention was given to U.S. soldiers' abuse of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib than to the fact that Sgt. 1st Class Paul Ray Smith received the Medal of Honor.
check
Both points seem dead on accurate to me. Obviously, your mileage varies.

Posted:
Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:55 pm
by KnoxVegas
Zeuslax wrote:If only we lived in a mythical land where you fight with words...........
That used to be called the 4th grade.