Page 1 of 1

Dealership Doesn't Like Deal, Takes Car Back

PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:57 am
by Sonny
It will be interesting to see how this one plays out...

Car dealers are often the butt of jokes. But one local truck buyer is not laughing about the deal that he got -- and lost. Consumer advocates say this case raises lots of questions about how a well-known auto dealer does business.

Earl Kieselhorst thought he owned a 2003 Chevy Silverado -- a truck that he bought from Bill Heard Chevrolet in Antioch.

Kieselhorst says he "paid cash for it. Made the deal. Sales manager signed off on it. Signed all the paperwork. And drove off."

He traded in his car and gave the dealer a check for $8,100.

"I have the keys," Kieselhorst tells NewsChannel 5 investigative reporter Jennifer Kraus.

But he doesn't have his truck.

Bill Heard does.

"I can't see any reason why this wouldn't be my car," he adds.

Just one day after he bought the truck, a salesman from Bill Heard called to say the dealership was having second thoughts about the deal.

He told Kieselhorst that if he wanted to keep his truck, he needed to fork over another $10,000 -- something he refused to do. After all, he says, they had a signed deal.

But the next morning, when Kieselhorst woke up, his truck was gone.


Rest of the article here:
http://www.newschannel5.com/content/inv ... BILL+HEARD

PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:26 am
by Brent Burns
Yeah, this case is worth watching to see if the "rightful" owner of the truck will have his day in court.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:02 pm
by usdlax38
This is just a really bad idea for the dealership. If the bad press from this incident scares away only 3 or 4 potential customers they will lose alot more than $10,000.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:23 pm
by DanGenck
I may not be a big city lawyer... but it seems to me that legally binding business contracts usually hold up in court pretty well.

Just my gut feeling...