Kyle Berggren wrote:PLULax wrote:4 seed gets 5 v. 12 winner, 3 gets 6/11, 2 gets 7/10, 1 gets 8/9. . .
Wouldn't you want top team playing the lowest seed? not necessarily the winner of 5v12 etc? I've always been torn on which way is better, and I'm still not sure.
The only quality I like of having a bye team play the winner of one certain game is that you have a physical bracket that you can easily figure out who plays on day 2. But overall, I prefer to see #1 play the lowest remaining seed, #2 play the second lowest remaining seed, etc. Yes, these teams already got a benefit for being seeded so high, but it's unfair if #2 has to play 7 and #4 gets to play 12 (for example).